Cited by 359Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesAdvancements in Battery Materials

The novel state of charge estimation method for lithium battery using sliding mode observer

Kim, Il-Song·2006·Journal of Power Sources

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.006

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, I.-S.
Affiliations
LG Chem (South Korea) (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Il-Song
Venue
Journal of Power Sources
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
163
Issue
1
Pages
584-590
ISSN
0378-7753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021946857
Cited by
359
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
FWCI
8.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Power Sources (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
Keywords
lithium batteries, state of charge estimation, sliding mode observer, model error compensation, robust control, Lyapunov stability, UDDS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review