A realistic vapour phase heat transfer model for the weathering of LNG stored in large tanks
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both models consider heat ingress in the vapor and liquid phases separately and enable heat transfer between the two phases across the interfacial surface area.
“Both models consider heat ingress in the vapor and liquid phases separately and enable heat transfer between the two phases across the interfacial surface area.”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [39]
Many computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and thermodynamic boil-off models have been developed for cryogenic liquids such as liquefied natural gas (LNG), including models based on heat ingress and subsequent BOG rates and those accounting for heat transfer between the vapor and liquid phases.
“Many computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and thermodynamic boil-off models have been developed for cryogenic liquids such as liquefied natural gas (LNG), including models based on heat ingress and subsequent BOG rates and those accounting for heat transfer between the vapor and liquid phases [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55].”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [39]
Huerta and Vesovic expanded the non-equilibrium model to include more realistic heat transfer mechanisms in the vapor phase.
“This was then expanded by Huerta and Vesovic [39] to include more realistic heat transfer mechanisms in the vapor phase.”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
Experimental investigation of thermal stratification in cryogenic tanks
Kang, M., Kim, J., You, H., & Chang, D. (2018) · Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science · doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.12.017 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off
Al Ghafri, S. Z. S., Swanger, A., Jusko, V., Siahvashi, A., Perez, F., Johns, M. L., & May, E. F. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15031149 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“This was then expanded by Huerta and Vesovic [39] to include more realistic heat transfer mechanisms in the vapor phase.”
MethodPerez, F., Al Ghafri, S. Z. S., Gallagher, L., Siahvashi, A., Ryu, Y., Kim, S., Kim, S. G., Johns, M. L., & May, E. F. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.119853 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Advanced Boil-Off Gas Studies for Liquefied Natural Gas
Al Ghafri, S. Z. S., Perez, F., Heum Park, K., Gallagher, L., Warr, L., Stroda, A., Siahvashi, A., Ryu, Y., Kim, S., Kim, S. G., et al. (2021) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116735 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huerta, F., & Vesovic, V.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Vesovic, Velisa
- Venue
- Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 174
- Pages
- 280-291
- ISSN
- 0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2917777462
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Energy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- CONICYT
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
- Keywords
- boil-off gas, non-equilibrium model, LNG storage tanks, advection, natural convection, boil-off rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
