Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Membrane electrode assemblies for PEM fuel cells: A review of functional graded design and optimization

Open access
Xing, Lei, Shi, Weidong, Su, Huaneng, Xu, Qian, Das, Prodip K., Mao, Baodong, Scott, Keith·2019·Energy

Abstract

The use of platinum as a catalyst and the nonuniform distribution of current density inside a membrane electrode assembly result in high cost and low durability, which strongly hinders the wide adoption of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. For proton exchange membrane fuel cells operated at various loads, the required activities and mass transport rates are different because the reactant and product are nonuniformly distributed inside the membrane electrode assembly. Thus, a rational design for a membrane electrode assembly with a spatial distribution of functional components is helpful for reducing the usage of precious components, improving cell performance, and achieving uniform distributions of current density and heat. Herein, the graded design of the functional components in the gas diffusion layer, microporous layer, catalyst layer, and membrane along both the through-plane and in-plane directions within the membrane electrode assembly are reviewed for the purpose of reducing the cost and improving the performance and durability of proton exchange membrane fuel cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.084

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Xing, L., Shi, W., Su, H., Xu, Q., Das, P. K., Mao, B., & Scott, K.
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
177
Pages
445-464
ISSN
0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2940157895
Cited by
256
References
3
FWCI
10.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.