The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning based forecasting of photovoltaic power generation by incorporating domain knowledge
Open accessAbstract
Solar energy constitutes an effective supplement to traditional energy sources. However, photovoltaic power generation (PVPG) is strongly weather-dependent, and thus highly intermittent. High-precision forecasting of PVPG forms the basis of the production, transmission, and distribution of electricity, ensuring the stability and reliability of power systems. In this work, we propose a deep learning based framework for accurate PVPG forecasting. In particular, taking advantage of the long short-term memory (LSTM) network in solving sequential-data based regression problems, this paper considers the specific domain knowledge of PV and proposes a physics-constrained LSTM (PC-LSTM) to forecast the hourly day-ahead PVPG. It aims to overcome the shortcoming of recent machine learning algorithms that are applied based only on massive data, and thus easily producing unreasonable forecasts. Real-life PV datasets are adopted to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the models. Sensitivity analysis is conducted for the selection of input feature variables based on a two-stage hybrid method. The results indicate that the proposed PC-LSTM model possesses stronger forecasting capability than the standard LSTM model. It is more robust against PVPG forecasting, and more suitable for PVPG forecasting with sparse data in practice. The PC-LSTM model also demonstrates superior performance with higher accuracy of PVPG forecasting compared to conventional machine learning and statistical methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Bidirectional recurrent neural networks
Schuster, M., & Paliwal, K. K. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.650093 · Cited by 10,172
Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., & Huyvaert, K. P. (2011) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6 · Cited by 4,104
Feature selection for classification
DASH, M., & LIU, H. (1997) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/s1088-467x(97)00008-5 · Cited by 3,574
Forecasting of photovoltaic power generation and model optimization: a review
Das, U. K., Tey, K. S., Seyedmahmoudian, M., Mekhilef, S., Idris, M. Y. I., Van Deventer, W., Horan, B., & Stojcevski, A. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.017 · Cited by 1,211
Probabilistic energy forecasting: Global Energy Forecasting Competition 2014 and beyond
Hong, T., Pinson, P., Fan, S., Zareipour, H., Troccoli, A., & Hyndman, R. J. (2016) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2016.02.001 · Cited by 1,044
The sun’s total and spectral irradiance for solar energy applications and solar radiation models
Gueymard, C. A. (2004) · Solar Energy · doi:10.1016/j.solener.2003.08.039 · Cited by 1,040
Predicting time series with support vector machines
Müller, K. R., Smola, A. J., Rätsch, G., Schölkopf, B., Kohlmorgen, J., & Vapnik, V. (1997) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0020283 · Cited by 981
Hourly day-ahead solar irradiance prediction using weather forecasts by LSTM
Qing, X., & Niu, Y. (2018) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.177 · Cited by 950
von Rueden, L., Mayer, S., Beckh, K., Georgiev, B., Giesselbach, S., Heese, R., Kirsch, B., Walczak, M., Pfrommer, J., Pick, A., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2021.3079836 · Cited by 793
Cited by
A review of some techniques for inclusion of domain-knowledge into deep neural networks
Dash, T., Chitlangia, S., Ahuja, A., & Srinivasan, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-04590-0 · Cited by 196
“…ILBKRME [30] MLP HDNNLR [64] CNN, RNN SBR [68] MLP SBR [69] CNN DL2 [ 66 ] CNN Semantic Loss [ 63 ] CNN LENSR [ 91 ] GNN DANN [ 67 ] MLP PC-LSTM [ 72 ] RNN DomiKnowS [ 73 ] DNN* MultiplexNet [ 74 ] MLP, CNN Analogy Model [ 75 ] RNN Transforming Model KBANN [ 86 ] MLP Cascade-ARTMAP [ 89 ] ARTMAP…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, X., Zhang, D., & Zhu, X.
- Venue
- Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 225
- Pages
- 120240
- ISSN
- 0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3133901049
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 17.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning based forecasting of photovoltaic power generation by incorporating domain knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120240
- The paper
- Luo, X., Zhang, D., & Zhu, X. (2021). Deep learning based forecasting of photovoltaic power generation by incorporating domain knowledge. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.