CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The implications of circular economy strategies on the future energy transition technologies and their impacts: Solar PV as a case study

Hu, Xueyue, Elshkaki, Ayman, Shen, Lei·2024·Energy
DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133972
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133972

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. Creutzig, 2017, The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change, Nat Energy, 2, 10.1038/nenergy.2017.140 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Victoria, 2021, Solar photovoltaics is ready to power a sustainable future, Joule, 5, 1041, 10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.005 · DOI
  3. Heath, 2020, Research and development priorities for silicon photovoltaic module recycling to support a circular economy, Nat Energy, 5, 502, 10.1038/s41560-020-0645-2 · DOI
  4. Khalifa, 2022, Dynamic material flow analysis of silicon photovoltaic modules to support a circular economy transition, Progress in Photovoltaics, 30, 784, 10.1002/pip.3554 · DOI
  5. Xie, 2023, Nexus and synergy between the low-carbon economy and circular economy: a systematic and critical review, Environ Impact Assess Rev, 100, 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107077 · DOI
  6. Bustamante, 2014, Challenges in assessment of clean energy supply-chains based on byproduct minerals: a case study of tellurium use in thin film photovoltaics, Appl Energy, 123, 397, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.065 · DOI
  7. Kavlak, 2015, Metals production requirements for rapid photovoltaics deployment, Energy Environ Sci, 8, 1651, 10.1039/C5EE00585J · DOI
  8. Elshkaki, 2020, Material-energy-water nexus: modelling the long term implications of aluminium demand and supply on global climate change up to 2050, Environ Res, 181, 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108964 · DOI
  9. Vidal, 2022, Modelling the demand and access of mineral resources in a changing world, Sustainability, 14, 10.3390/su14010011 · DOI
  10. Wang, 2021, Efficiency stagnation in global steel production urges joint supply- and demand-side mitigation efforts, Nat Commun, 12, 2066, 10.1038/s41467-021-22245-6 · DOI
  11. Fizaine, 2013, Byproduct production of minor metals: threat or opportunity for the development of clean technologies? The PV sector as an illustration, Resour Pol, 38, 373, 10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.05.002 · DOI
  12. Fthenakis, 2004, Life cycle impact analysis of cadmium in CdTe PV production, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 8, 303, 10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.001 · DOI
  13. Feltrin, 2008, Material considerations for terawatt level deployment of photovoltaics, Renew Energy, 33, 180, 10.1016/j.renene.2007.05.024 · DOI
  14. Candelise, 2011, Materials availability for thin film (TF) PV technologies development: a real concern?, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 15, 4972, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.06.012 · DOI
  15. Tao, 2011, Natural resource limitations to terawatt-scale solar cells, SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 95, 3176, 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.06.013 · DOI
  16. Grandell, 2014, Silver supply risk analysis for the solar sector, Renew Energy, 69, 157, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.032 · DOI
  17. Grandell, 2015, Assessing rare metal availability challenges for solar energy technologies, Sustainability, 7, 11818, 10.3390/su70911818 · DOI
  18. Geissdoerfer, 2017, The Circular Economy – a new sustainability paradigm?, J Clean Prod, 143, 757, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Heath, 2022, A critical review of the circular economy for lithium-ion batteries and photovoltaic modules – status, challenges, and opportunities, J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 72, 478, 10.1080/10962247.2022.2068878 · DOI
  20. Rabaia, 2022, Recent progress towards photovoltaics' circular economy, J Clean Prod, 373, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133864 · DOI
  21. Zweibel, 2010, The impact of tellurium supply on cadmium telluride photovoltaics, Science, 328, 699, 10.1126/science.1189690 · DOI
  22. Zuser, 2011, Considerations of resource availability in technology development strategies: the case study of photovoltaics, Resour Conserv Recycl, 56, 56, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.004 · DOI
  23. Stamp, 2014, Linking energy scenarios with metal demand modeling-The case of indium in CIGS solar cells, Resour Conserv Recycl, 93, 156, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.10.012 · DOI
  24. Davidsson, 2017, Material requirements and availability for multi-terawatt deployment of photovoltaics, Energy Pol, 108, 574, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.028 · DOI
  25. Fthenakis, 2009, Sustainability of photovoltaics: the case for thin-film solar cells, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 13, 2746, 10.1016/j.rser.2009.05.001 · DOI
  26. Ren, 2021, Evaluating metal constraints for photovoltaics: perspectives from China's PV development, Appl Energy, 282, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116148 · DOI
  27. Velenturf, 2021, Reducing material criticality through circular business models: challenges in renewable energy, One Earth, 4, 350, 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.02.016 · DOI
  28. Babbitt, 2021, The role of design in circular economy solutions for critical materials, One Earth, 4, 353, 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.02.014 · DOI
  29. Helbig, 2016, Supply risks associated with CdTe and CIGS thin-film photovoltaics, Appl Energy, 178, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.102 · DOI
  30. Houari, 2014, A system dynamics model of tellurium availability for CdTe PV: a system dynamics model of Te availability for CdTe PV, Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl., 22, 129, 10.1002/pip.2359 · DOI
  31. Kim, 2018, PV waste management at the crossroads of circular economy and energy transition: the case of South Korea, Sustainability, 10, 3565, 10.3390/su10103565 · DOI
  32. Kastanaki, 2022, Energy decarbonisation in the European Union: assessment of photovoltaic waste recycling potential, Renew Energy, 192, 1, 10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.098 · DOI
  33. Contreras-Lisperguer, 2021, A set of principles for applying Circular Economy to the PV industry: modeling a closed-loop material cycle system for crystalline photovoltaic panels, Sustain Prod Consum, 28, 164, 10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.033 · DOI
  34. Ovaitt, 2022, PV in the circular economy, a dynamic framework analyzing technology evolution and reliability impacts, iScience, 25, 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103488 · DOI
  35. Zeng, 2023, Win-Win: anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutrality, Front Environ Sci Eng, 17, 23, 10.1007/s11783-023-1623-2 · DOI
  36. Raugei, 2010, Cadmium flows and emissions from CdTe PV: future expectations, Energy Pol, 38, 5223, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.007 · DOI
  37. Lennon, 2022, The aluminium demand risk of terawatt photovoltaics for net zero emissions by 2050, Nat Sustain, 5, 357, 10.1038/s41893-021-00838-9 · DOI
  38. Mukoro, 2022, A framework for environmental evaluation of business models: a test case of solar energy in Kenya, Sustain Prod Consum, 34, 202, 10.1016/j.spc.2022.09.007 · DOI
  39. Merli, 2018, How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review, J Clean Prod, 178, 703, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 · DOI
  40. Kirchherr, 2017, Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions, Resour Conserv Recycl, 127, 221, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Wadia, 2009, Materials availability expands the opportunity for large-scale photovoltaics deployment, Environ Sci Technol, 43, 2072, 10.1021/es8019534 · DOI
  42. Ravikumar, 2013, Material constraints for indigenous production of CdTe PV: evidence from a Monte Carlo experiment using India's national solar mission benchmarks, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 25, 393, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.030 · DOI
  43. Salim, 2019, Drivers, barriers and enablers to end-of-life management of solar photovoltaic and battery energy storage systems: a systematic literature review, J Clean Prod, 211, 537, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.229 · DOI
  44. Franco, 2021, A systematic literature review of the solar photovoltaic value chain for a circular economy, Sustainability, 13, 9615, 10.3390/su13179615 · DOI
  45. Goe, 2014, Identifying critical materials for photovoltaics in the US: a multi-metric approach, Appl Energy, 123, 387, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.025 · DOI
  46. Gautam, 2021, End-of-life solar photovoltaic e-waste assessment in India: a step towards a circular economy, Sustain Prod Consum, 13
  47. Vellini, 2017, Environmental impacts of PV technology throughout the life cycle: importance of the end-of-life management for Si-panels and CdTe-panels, Energy, 138, 1099, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.031 · DOI
  48. Mathur, 2020, Promoting a circular economy in the solar photovoltaic industry using life cycle symbiosis, Resour Conserv Recycl, 155, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104649 · DOI
  49. Huang, 2017, Environmental influence assessment of China's multi-crystalline silicon (multi-Si) photovoltaic modules considering recycling process, Sol Energy, 143, 132, 10.1016/j.solener.2016.12.038 · DOI
  50. Malandrino, 2017, Policies and measures for sustainable management of solar panel end-of-life in Italy, Sustainability, 9, 481, 10.3390/su9040481 · DOI
  51. Prabhu, 2022, Life cycle assessment of solar photovoltaic in India: a circular economy approach, Circ.Econ.Sust., 2, 507, 10.1007/s43615-021-00101-5 · DOI
  52. Contreras Lisperguer, 2020, Environmental impact assessment of crystalline solar photovoltaic panels' end-of-life phase: open and closed-loop material flow scenarios, Sustain Prod Consum, 23, 157, 10.1016/j.spc.2020.05.008 · DOI
  53. Kim, 2016, Closed-loop supply chain planning model for a photovoltaic system manufacturer with internal and external recycling, Sustainability, 8, 10.3390/su8070596 · DOI
  54. Ganesan, 2022, Anticipatory life cycle analysis framework for sustainable management of end-of-life crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels, Energy, 245, 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123207 · DOI
  55. Bogacka, 2020, PV waste thermal treatment according to the circular economy concept, Sustainability, 12, 10.3390/su122410562 · DOI
  56. Sica, 2018, Management of end-of-life photovoltaic panels as a step towards a circular economy, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 82, 2934, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.039 · DOI
  57. Tsanakas, 2020, Towards a circular supply chain for PV modules: review of today's challenges in PV recycling, refurbishment and re‐certification, Prog Photovolt Res Appl, 28, 454, 10.1002/pip.3193 · DOI
  58. Jain, 2022, End-of-life management of solar PV waste in India: situation analysis and proposed policy framework, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 153, 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111774 · DOI
  59. Gautam, 2022, Managing end-of-life solar photovoltaic e-waste in India: a circular economy approach, J Bus Res, 142, 287, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.034 · DOI
  60. Kim, 2019, Life cycle assessment for a solar energy system based on reuse components for developing countries, J Clean Prod, 208, 1459, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.169 · DOI
  61. Hu, 2024, Material-energy Nexus: a systematic literature review, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 192, 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114217 · DOI
  62. Fthenakis, 2013, Direct Te mining: resource availability and impact on cumulative energy demand of CdTe PV life cycles, IEEE J Photovoltaics, 3, 433, 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.2216860 · DOI
  63. Elshkaki, 2019, Materials, energy, water, and emissions nexus impacts on the future contribution of PV solar technologies to global energy scenarios, Sci Rep, 9, 10.1038/s41598-019-55853-w · DOI
  64. Nassar, 2016, Byproduct metal requirements for U.S. wind and solar photovoltaic electricity generation up to the year 2040 under various Clean Power Plan scenarios, Appl Energy, 183, 1209, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.062 · DOI
  65. Watari, 2018, Analysis of potential for critical metal resource constraints in the international energy agency's long-term low-carbon energy scenarios, Minerals, 8, 156, 10.3390/min8040156 · DOI
  66. Valero, 2018, Material bottlenecks in the future development of green technologies, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 93, 178, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.041 · DOI
  67. Nassar, 2015, Criticality of the rare earth elements: criticality of the rare earth elements, J Ind Ecol, 19, 1044, 10.1111/jiec.12237 · DOI
  68. Viebahn, 2015, Assessing the need for critical minerals to shift the German energy system towards a high proportion of renewables, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 49, 655, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.070 · DOI
  69. Velenturf, 2021, Principles for a sustainable circular economy, Sustain Prod Consum, 27, 1437, 10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.018 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Graedel, 2022, Alloy profusion, spice metals, and resource loss by design, Sustainability, 14, 7535, 10.3390/su14137535 · DOI
  71. Walzberg, 2021, Role of the social factors in success of solar photovoltaic reuse and recycle programmes, Nat Energy, 6, 913, 10.1038/s41560-021-00888-5 · DOI
  72. Mendoza, 2022, Circular economy business models and technology management strategies in the wind industry: sustainability potential, industrial challenges and opportunities, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 163, 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112523 · DOI
  73. Barrie, 2017, Shedding light on the last mile: a study on the diffusion of pay as you go solar home systems in central East Africa, Energy Pol, 107, 425, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.016 · DOI
  74. Khorasanizadeh, 2016, Adoption factors of cleaner production technology in a developing country: energy efficient lighting in Malaysia, J Clean Prod, 131, 97, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.070 · DOI
  75. Dias, 2022, High yield, low cost, environmentally friendly process to recycle silicon solar panels: technical, economic and environmental feasibility assessment, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 169, 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112900 · DOI
  76. Mehedi, 2022, Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy footprints of utility-scale solar energy systems, Appl Energy, 314, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118918 · DOI
  77. Nugent, 2014, Assessing the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from solar PV and wind energy: a critical meta-survey, Energy Pol, 65, 229, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.048 · DOI
  78. Hsu, 2012, Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of crystalline silicon photovoltaic electricity generation: systematic review and harmonization, J Ind Ecol, 16, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00439.x · DOI
  79. Kim, 2012, Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of thin‐film photovoltaic electricity generation: systematic review and harmonization, J Ind Ecol, 16, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00423.x · DOI
  80. Kim, 2023, Identifying methods to reduce emission intensity of centralised Photovoltaic deployment for net zero by 2050: life cycle assessment case study of a 30 MW PV plant, Progress in Photovoltaics, 31, 1493, 10.1002/pip.3747 · DOI
  81. Bleiwas, 2010, Byproductt mineral commodities used for the production of photovoltaic cells, US Geol Surv Circular, 1365
  82. Norgate, 2011, Reducing the greenhouse gas footprint of primary metal production: where should the focus be?, Miner Eng, 24, 1563, 10.1016/j.mineng.2011.08.007 · DOI
  83. Elshkaki, 2015, Solar cell metals and their hosts: a tale of oversupply and undersupply, Appl Energy, 158, 167, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.066 · DOI
  84. Wang, 2023, Future demand for electricity generation materials under different climate mitigation scenarios, Joule, 7, 309, 10.1016/j.joule.2023.01.001 · DOI
  85. Vidal, 2018, Modelling the material and energy costs of the transition to low-carbon energy, EPJ Web Conf, 189, 10.1051/epjconf/201818900018 · DOI
  86. Mirletz, 2022, Circular economy priorities for photovoltaics in the energy transition, PLoS One, 17, 10.1371/journal.pone.0274351 · DOI
  87. Peng, 2019, vol. 158, 3937
  88. Simoes, 2023, Materials, resources, and CO2 impacts of building new renewable power plants to reach EU's goals of carbon neutrality, J Clean Prod, 418, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138138 · DOI
  89. Liu, 2013, Stock dynamics and emission pathways of the global aluminium cycle, Nat Clim Change, 3, 338, 10.1038/nclimate1698 · DOI
  90. Markert, 2020, Private and externality costs and benefits of recycling crystalline silicon (c-Si) photovoltaic panels, Energies, 13, 3650, 10.3390/en13143650 · DOI
  91. Ferreras-Alonso, 2024, Mitigation of land-related impacts of solar deployment in the European Union through land planning policies, Energy, 302, 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131617 · DOI
  92. Choi, 2018, Global strategic level supply planning of materials critical to clean energy technologies – a case study on indium, Energy, 147, 950, 10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.063 · DOI
  93. Wang, 2024, Regional rare-earth element supply and demand balanced with circular economy strategies, Nat Geosci, 17, 94, 10.1038/s41561-023-01350-9 · DOI
  94. Luo, 2021, Why common interests and collective action are not enough for environmental cooperation – lessons from the China-EU cooperation discourse on circular economy, Global Environ Change, 71, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102389 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hu, X., Elshkaki, A., & Shen, L.
ORCID
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
313
Pages
133972
ISSN
0360-5442
DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2024.133972
Cited by
10
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review