The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hybrid structures in time series modeling and forecasting: A review
Abstract
Abstract The key factor in selecting appropriate forecasting model is accuracy. Given the deficiencies of single models in processing various patterns and relationships latent in data, hybrid approaches have been known as promising techniques to achieve more accurate results for time series modeling and forecasting. Therefore, a rapid development has been evolved in time series forecasting fields in order to access accurate results. While, numerous review papers have been concentrated on the use of hybrid models and their advantages in improving forecasting accuracy versus individual models in wide variety of areas, no study is concerned to categorize and review papers from the structural point of view in numerous developed studies. The main goal of this paper is to analyze hybrid structures by surveying more than 150 papers employed various hybrid models in time series modeling and forecasting domains. In this paper, the classification of hybrid models is made based on three main combination structures: parallel, series, and parallel–series. Then, reviewed papers are analyzed comprehensively with respect to their specific features of employed hybrid structure. Through reviewed articles, it can be observed that combined methods are viable and accurate approaches for time series forecasting and also the parallel–series hybrid structure can obtain more accurate and promising results than other those hybrid structures. Besides this paper provides the viable research directions for each hybrid structure to help the researchers in time series forecasting area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118
Bates, J. M., & Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1969.103 · Cited by 3,201
Model Selection and Accounting for Model Uncertainty in Graphical Models Using Occam's Window
Madigan, D., & Raftery, A. E. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476894 · Cited by 1,205
Simple robust averages of forecasts: Some empirical results
Jose, V. R. R., & Winkler, R. L. (2008) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.06.001 · Cited by 242
Forecasting stock index returns using ARIMA-SVM, ARIMA-ANN, and ARIMA-random forest hybrid models
Kumar, M., & Thenmozhi, M. (2014) · International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance · doi:10.1504/ijbaaf.2014.064307 · Cited by 135
Cited by
A machine learning forecasting model for COVID-19 pandemic in India
Sujath, R., Chatterjee, J. M., & Hassanien, A. E. (2020) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-020-01827-8 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Hajirahimi, Z., & Khashei, M.
- Venue
- Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 86
- Pages
- 83-106
- ISSN
- 0952-1976 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2971973336
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hybrid structures in time series modeling and forecasting: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.08.018
- The paper
- Hajirahimi, Z., & Khashei, M. (2019). Hybrid structures in time series modeling and forecasting: A review. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.08.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.