Cited by 438Structural Load-Bearing AnalysisStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFire effects on concrete materials

Axial performance of short concrete filled steel tubes with high- and ultra-high-strength materials

Xiong, Ming-Xiang, Xiong, De-Xin, Liew, J.Y. Richard·2017·Engineering Structures

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.037

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiong, M.-X., Xiong, D.-X., & Liew, J. Y. R.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Nanjing Tech University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xiong, Ming-Xiang
Venue
Engineering Structures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
136
Pages
494-510
ISSN
0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2585708975
Cited by
438
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 4
FWCI
28.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Engineering Structures (publishedVersion)
Funders
A∗STAR (092 142 0045)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Fire effects on concrete materials
Keywords
concrete-filled steel tubes, high-strength steel, ultra-high strength concrete, ultimate limit state, design code comparison, design guidelines, high-rise buildings, composite members

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review