Cited by 172Structural Load-Bearing AnalysisStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteInnovative concrete reinforcement materials

Experimental study on circular steel tube-confined reinforced UHPC columns under axial loading

Wei, Jiangang, Xie, Zhitao, Zhang, Wei, Luo, Xia, Yang, Yan, Chen, Baochun·2021·Engineering Structures

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111599

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wei, J., Xie, Z., Zhang, W., Luo, X., Yang, Y., & Chen, B.
Affiliations
  • Fuzhou University (CN)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (CZ)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Wei
Venue
Engineering Structures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
230
Pages
111599
ISSN
0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3114235505
Cited by
172
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 3
FWCI
10.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Engineering Structures (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Keywords
steel tube confinement, axial loading, stub columns, steel fibers, shear failure, failure modes, bearing capacity prediction, ductility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review