The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.
Tsoukias, A., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1994) · The Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2584151 · Cited by 8,370
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs
Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174084 · Cited by 4,426
The Theory of Environmental Policy
Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173513 · Cited by 2,845
The Theory of Environmental Policy
Crocker, T. D., Randall, A., Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1976) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3145303 · Cited by 2,272
Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6 · Cited by 2,210
Multiobjective Programming and Planning
(1978) · Mathematics in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0076-5392(08)x6053-9 · Cited by 2,020
Multiple attribute decision making : an introduction
Yoon, K., & Hwang, C. L. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,349
The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications
Zahedi, F. (1986) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.16.4.96 · Cited by 1,329
Multiple Attribute Decision Making
Yoon, K., & Hwang, C.-L. (1995) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412985161 · Cited by 1,294
Cited by
Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., & Zhao, J.-H. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 · Cited by 2,346
A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development
Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., & Bansal, R. C. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191 · Cited by 1,622
Categorising tools for sustainability assessment
Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023 · Cited by 1,407
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys
(2016) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4 · Cited by 1,081
STATE OF ART SURVEYS OF OVERVIEWS ON MCDM/MADM METHODS
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Kildienė, S. (2014) · Technological and Economic Development of Economy · doi:10.3846/20294913.2014.892037 · Cited by 931
Metadata
- Authors
- Greening, L. A., & Bernow, S.
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 721-735
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984349989
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.017
- The paper
- Greening, L. A., & Bernow, S. (2004). Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
