CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 126

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Co-evolution of waste and electricity regimes: Multi-regime dynamics in the Netherlands (1969–2003)

Raven, Rob·2007·Energy Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.07.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.07.005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Abernathy, 1985, Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction, Research Policy, 14, 3, 10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6 · DOI
  2. Arthur, 1989, Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events, The Economic Journal, 99, 116, 10.2307/2234208 · DOI · Paper page
  3. David, 1985, Clio and the economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review Proceedings, 75, 332
  4. Garud, 2003, Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship, Research Policy, 32, 277, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2 · DOI
  5. Grin, 2003, Een derde generatie milieubeleid: een sociologisch perspectief en een beleidswetenschappelijk programma, Beleidswetenschap, 17, 51
  6. Jacobsson, 2004, Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 815, 10.1093/icc/dth032 · DOI
  7. Jacobsson, 2000, The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research, Research Policy, 28, 625
  8. Jacobsson, 2006, The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology, Energy Policy, 34, 256, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.029 · DOI
  9. Keijzers, 2000, The evolution of Dutch environmental policy: the changing ecological arena from 1970–2000 and beyond, Journal of Cleaner Production, 8, 179, 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00003-2 · DOI
  10. Kemp, 1998, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of Strategic Niche Management, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10, 175, 10.1080/09537329808524310 · DOI
  11. Konrad, K., Voss, J.P., Truffer, B., 2004. Transformation dynamics in utility systems. An integrated approach to the analysis of transformation processes drawing on transition theory. In: Jacob, K., Binder, M., Wieczorek, A. (Eds.), Governance for Industrial Transformation, Proceedings of the 2003 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, pp. 146–162.
  12. Levinthal, 1998, The slow pace of rapid technological change: gradualism an punctuation in technological change, Industrial and Corporate Change, 7, 217, 10.1093/icc/7.2.217 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Lynn, 1996, Marketing and discontinuous innovation: the probe and learn process, California Management Review, 38, 8, 10.2307/41165841 · DOI
  14. Malerba, 2002, Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research Policy, 31, 247, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Malerba, 2005, Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14, 63, 10.1080/1043859042000228688 · DOI
  16. Parto, S., Loorbach, D., Lansink, A., Kemp, R. (2006), Transitions and institutional change: the case of the Dutch waste subsystem. In: Parto, S., Herbert-Copley, B. (Eds.), Industrial Innovation and Environmental Regulation: Towards an Integrated Approach. United Nations University Press (forthcoming).
  17. Raven, 2004, Implementation of manure digestion and co-combustion in the Dutch electricity regime: a multi-level analysis of market implementation in The Netherlands, Energy Policy, 32, 29, 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00248-3 · DOI
  18. Raven, R.P.J.M., 2005. Strategic Niche Management for biomass. Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.
  19. Raven, 2006, Towards alternative trajectories? Reconfigurations in the Dutch electricity regime, Research Policy, 35, 581, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.001 · DOI
  20. Rip, 1998, Technological change, vol. 2, 327
  21. Smith, 2006, The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions, Research Policy, 34, 1491, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Tushman, 1986, Technological discontinuities and organization environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439, 10.2307/2392832 · DOI
  23. Unruh, 2000, Understanding carbon lock-in, Energy Policy, 28, 817, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Voorter, 1991, W/k-installatie van 300 MWe in Moerdrijk verwerkt stoom vuilverbranding, Energie & Milieutechnologie, 11/12, 14
  25. Walker, 2000, Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations, Research Policy, 29, 833, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00108-6 · DOI
  26. Winskel, 2002, When systems are overthrown: the ‘dash for gas’ in the British electricity supply industry, Social Studies of Science, 32, 563

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Raven, R.
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
2197-2208
ISSN
0301-4215
DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2006.07.005
Cited by
126
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review