Cited by 176Climate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate Change and GeoengineeringAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Climate trade-off between black carbon and carbon dioxide emissions

Boucher, O., Reddy, M.S.·2008·Energy Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.039

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boucher, O., & Reddy, M. S.
Affiliations
Met Office (GB)
Corresponding author
Boucher, O.
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
193-200
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965838171
Cited by
176
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
16.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Energy Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
black carbon, CO2 emissions, global temperature change potential, global warming potential, short-lived climate pollutants, fuel penalty, radiative forcing, emission reduction, climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review