Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Firm performance and employment in the EU emissions trading scheme: An empirical assessment for Germany

Anger, Niels, Oberndorfer, Ulrich·2008·Energy Policy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Alexeeva-Talebi, V., Anger, N., 2007. Developing supra-European Emissions Trading Schemes: an efficiency and international trade analysis. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 07-038, Mannheim. · DOI
  2. Anger, N., 2007. Emissions trading beyond Europe: linking schemes in a post-Kyoto world. Energy Economics doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2007.08.002. · DOI
  3. Balassa, B., 1962. Recent developments in the competitiveness of American industry and prospects for the future. In: Joint Economic Committee—Congress of the United States (Eds.), Factors Affecting the United States Balance of Payments. Washington, DC, pp. 27–54.
  4. Blacconiere, 1997, Environmental information and market reactions to environmental legislation, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 12, 149, 10.1177/0148558X9701200203 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Böhringer, 2005, Economic implications of alternative allocation schemes for emission allowances, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107, 563, 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2005.00423.x · DOI
  6. Böhringer, 2005, Assessing emissions regulation in Europe: an interactive simulation approach, Energy Journal, 26, 1, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol26-No4-1 · DOI
  7. Brunnermeier, 2003, Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 278, 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00058-X · DOI · Paper page
  8. Butler, 1991, Election returns as a signal of changing regulatory climate, Energy Economics, 13, 48, 10.1016/0140-9883(91)90055-5 · doi:10.1016/0140-9883(91)90055-5
  9. Demailly, D., Quirion, P., 2007. European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: a case study on the iron and steel industry. Energy Economics doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.020. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Diltz, 2002, US Equity Markets and Environmental Policy: The case of electric utility investor behaviour during the passage of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Environmental and Resource Economics, 23, 379, 10.1023/A:1021351226459 · doi:10.1023/a:1021351226459
  11. Ellerman, D., Buchner, B., 2006. Over-allocation or abatement? A preliminary analysis of the EU ETS based on the 2005 emissions data. FEEM Nota di Lavoro 139.2006, Venice. · DOI
  12. Fischer, C., Fox, A.K., 2007. When revenue recycling isn’t enough: permit allocation strategies to minimize intra- and international emissions leakage. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Thessaloniki, Greece, June 28, 2007.
  13. Golombek, 1997, Do environmental standards harm manufacturing employment?, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99, 29, 10.1111/1467-9442.00045 · DOI
  14. Jaffe, 1997, Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study, Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 610, 10.1162/003465397557196 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Klepper, G., Peterson, S., 2004. The EU Emissions Trading Scheme, allowance prices, trade flows, competitiveness effects. Kiel Working Paper no. 1195, Kiel Institute for World Economics, Kiel. · DOI
  16. Neuhoff, 2006, Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impacts of the EU ETS emissions allowance allocations to the electricity sector, Climate Policy, 6, 73, 10.3763/cpol.2006.0605 · DOI
  17. Oberndorfer, 2007, Costs and competitiveness effects of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, European Environment, 17, 1, 10.1002/eet.438 · DOI
  18. Oberndorfer, U., Ziegler A., 2006. Environmentally oriented energy policy and stock returns: an empirical analysis. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 06-079, Mannheim. · DOI
  19. Pickman, 1998, The effect of environmental regulation on environmental innovation, Business Strategy and the Environment, 7, 223, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199809)7:4<223::AID-BSE164>3.0.CO;2-S · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0836(199809)7:4<223::aid-bse164>3.0.co;2-s
  20. Porter, 1995, Green and competitive: ending the stalemate, Harvard Business Review, September–October, 120
  21. UNFCCC, 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/CP/L.7/Add1, Kyoto. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Anger, N., & Oberndorfer, U.
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
12-22
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068018741
Cited by
195
References
2
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Firm performance and employment in the EU emissions trading scheme: An empirical assessment for Germany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.007
The paper
Anger, N., & Oberndorfer, U. (2008). Firm performance and employment in the EU emissions trading scheme: An empirical assessment for Germany. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.