Cited by 71Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEU Law and Policy AnalysisEnvironmental Policies and Emissions

CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation

Demailly, Damien, Quirion, Philippe·2006·Climate Policy

Abstract

A recurring concern raised by the European GHG Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is the fear of losses to EU industry through competition: both loss in domestic production and loss in profits. This article analyses how production and profits in the European cement industry may be affected by different approaches to the allocation of emissions allowances. We analyse two contrasting methods for the allocation of free allowances. With ‘grandfathering', the number of allowances a firm gets is independent of its current behaviour. With ‘output-based allocation', the number of allowances is proportional to the firm's current production level. Whereas almost all the quantitative assessments of the EU ETS assume grandfathering, the real allocation methods used by Member States, notably because of the updating every 5 years and of the special provisions for new plants and plant closings, stand somewhere between these two polar extremes. We study the impacts of these two contrasting allocation methods by linking a detailed trade model of homogeneous products with high transportation costs (GEO) with a bottom-up model of the cement industry (CEMSIM). The two allocation approaches have very different impacts on competitiveness and emissions abatements. Grandfathering 50% of past emissions to cement producers is enough to maintain aggregate profitability (EBITDA) at its business-as-usual level, but with significant production losses and CO2 leakage. For an output-based allocation over 75% of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3763/cpol.2006.0606

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Demailly, D., & Quirion, P.
Venue
Climate Policy
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
93-113
ISSN
  • 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-7457
OpenAlex
W3126026318
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
16.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Climate Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Environmental Policies and Emissions
Keywords
EU Emissions Trading System, grandfathering, output-based allocation, emission allowance allocation, cement industry, CO2 leakage, competitiveness, emission reduction, free allowances, EBITDA, production losses, trade models, EU climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review