Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Policy options for the split incentive: Increasing energy efficiency for low-income renters

Open access
Bird, Stephen, Hernández, Diana·2012·Energy Policy

Abstract

The split incentive problem concerns the lack of appropriate incentives to implement energy efficiency measures. In particular, low income tenants face a phenomenon of energy poverty in which they allocate significantly more of their household income to energy expenditures than other renters. This problem is substantial, affecting 1.89% of all United States' energy use. If effectively addressed, it would create a range of savings between 4 and 11 billion dollars per year for many of the nation's poorest residents. We argue that a carefully designed program of incentives for participants (including landlords) in conjunction with a unique type of utility-managed on-bill financing mechanism has significant potential to solve many of the complications. We focus on three kinds of split incentives, five concerns inherent to addressing split incentive problems (scale, endurance, incentives, savings, political disfavor), and provide a detailed policy proposal designed to surpass those problems, with a particular focus on low-income tenants in a U.S. context.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.053

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Baxter, 1998, Electricity policies for low-income households, Energy Policy, 26, 247, 10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00142-0 · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(97)00142-0
  2. Cox, 2010, Keeping PACE?: the case against property assessed clean energy financing programs, Harvard Business Review, 41, 50
  3. Jewell, 2009, The growing popularity of on-bill financing., Engineered Systems, 26, 18
  4. Johnson, 2011, Lessons learned from the field: key strategies for implementing successful on-the-bill financing programs., Energy Efficiency
  5. Kaiser, 2006, Concerns over the allocation methods employed in the US low-income home energy assistance program, Interfaces, 36, 344, 10.1287/inte.1060.0223 · doi:10.1287/inte.1060.0223
  6. Larson, 2011, Keeping PACE: federal mortgage lenders halt local clean energy programs, Missouri Law Review, 76, 599
  7. Van Nostrand, 2011, Legal issues in financing energy efficiency: creative solutions for funding the initial capital costs of investments in energy efficiency measures, Journal of Energy and Environmental Law
  8. Zimring, Mark. 2011. NYSERDA's Green Jobs-Green New York Program: Extending Energy Efficiency Financing to Underserved Households. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 〈http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3nz8s8gt〉. · doi:10.2172/1016370

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Bird, S., & Hernández, D.
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
48
Pages
506-514
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159234269
Cited by
313
References
10
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Policy options for the split incentive: Increasing energy efficiency for low-income renters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.053
The paper
Bird, S., & Hernández, D. (2012). Policy options for the split incentive: Increasing energy efficiency for low-income renters. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.053

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.