The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Policy options for the split incentive: Increasing energy efficiency for low-income renters
Open accessAbstract
The split incentive problem concerns the lack of appropriate incentives to implement energy efficiency measures. In particular, low income tenants face a phenomenon of energy poverty in which they allocate significantly more of their household income to energy expenditures than other renters. This problem is substantial, affecting 1.89% of all United States' energy use. If effectively addressed, it would create a range of savings between 4 and 11 billion dollars per year for many of the nation's poorest residents. We argue that a carefully designed program of incentives for participants (including landlords) in conjunction with a unique type of utility-managed on-bill financing mechanism has significant potential to solve many of the complications. We focus on three kinds of split incentives, five concerns inherent to addressing split incentive problems (scale, endurance, incentives, savings, political disfavor), and provide a detailed policy proposal designed to surpass those problems, with a particular focus on low-income tenants in a U.S. context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making
Stone, D. A. (1997) · Cited by 3,886
Energy Information Administration
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-3624 · Cited by 2,490
Jevons’ Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency
Sorrell, S. (2009) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.003 · Cited by 801
Polices for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experience in OECD countries
Geller, H., Harrington, P., Rosenfeld, A. H., Tanishima, S., & Unander, F. (2006) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.010 · Cited by 462
Measuring and monitoring energy poverty
Pachauri, S., & Spreng, D. (2011) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.008 · Cited by 362
Fixing Fuel Poverty: Challenges and Solutions
Boardman, B. (2009) · Cited by 330
Fixing Fuel Poverty: Challenges and Solutions
Spinney, J. (2012) · Housing Studies · doi:10.1080/02673037.2012.617915 · Cited by 329
Energy Burden and the Need for Integrated Low‐Income Housing and Energy Policy
Hernández, D., & Bird, S. (2010) · Poverty & Public Policy · doi:10.2202/1944-2858.1095 · Cited by 184
Self-citationUnlocking Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Economy
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), E. A. (.-3. (. A. C., Granade, H. C., Creyts, J., Derkach., A., Farese, P., Nyquist., S., & Ostrowski, K. (2009) · doi:10.2172/1219302 · Cited by 65
Toward a Low-Carbon Economy: Municipal Financing for Energy Efficiency and Solar Power
Fuller, M. C., Portis, S. C., & Kammen, D. M. (2009) · Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.3200/envt.51.1.22-33 · Cited by 55
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Baxter, 1998, Electricity policies for low-income households, Energy Policy, 26, 247, 10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00142-0 · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(97)00142-0
- Cox, 2010, Keeping PACE?: the case against property assessed clean energy financing programs, Harvard Business Review, 41, 50
- Jewell, 2009, The growing popularity of on-bill financing., Engineered Systems, 26, 18
- Johnson, 2011, Lessons learned from the field: key strategies for implementing successful on-the-bill financing programs., Energy Efficiency
- Kaiser, 2006, Concerns over the allocation methods employed in the US low-income home energy assistance program, Interfaces, 36, 344, 10.1287/inte.1060.0223 · doi:10.1287/inte.1060.0223
- Larson, 2011, Keeping PACE: federal mortgage lenders halt local clean energy programs, Missouri Law Review, 76, 599
- Van Nostrand, 2011, Legal issues in financing energy efficiency: creative solutions for funding the initial capital costs of investments in energy efficiency measures, Journal of Energy and Environmental Law
- Zimring, Mark. 2011. NYSERDA's Green Jobs-Green New York Program: Extending Energy Efficiency Financing to Underserved Households. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 〈http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3nz8s8gt〉. · doi:10.2172/1016370
Cited by
Review of 50 years of EU energy efficiency policies for buildings
Economidou, M., Todeschi, V., Bertoldi, P., D'Agostino, D., Zangheri, P., & Castellazzi, L. (2020) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110322 · Cited by 640
Understanding ‘energy insecurity’ and why it matters to health
Hernández, D. (2016) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.029 · Cited by 371
Self-citationHigh energy burden and low-income energy affordability: conclusions from a literature review
Brown, M. A., Soni, A., Lapsa, M. V., Southworth, K., & Cox, M. (2020) · Progress in Energy · doi:10.1088/2516-1083/abb954 · Cited by 221
Lewis, J., Hernández, D., & Geronimus, A. T. (2020) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-019-09820-z · Cited by 160
Self-citationA community-based approach to low-income residential energy efficiency participation barriers
Reames, T. G. (2016) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2015.1136995 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Bird, S., & Hernández, D.
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 48
- Pages
- 506-514
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159234269
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 3.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Policy options for the split incentive: Increasing energy efficiency for low-income renters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.053
- The paper
- Bird, S., & Hernández, D. (2012). Policy options for the split incentive: Increasing energy efficiency for low-income renters. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.