CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Explaining the diversity of motivations behind community renewable energy

Bauwens, Thomas·2016·Energy Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.017
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.017

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Spatial location of Ecopower and BeauVent members by provinces.
Figure 1 Spatial location of Ecopower and BeauVent members by provinces.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 2 Average number of shares purchased by categories of members.
Figure 2 Average number of shares purchased by categories of members.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure B1. Relative frequencies of cooperative members' motivations.
Figure B1. Relative frequencies of cooperative members' motivations.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Bamberg, 2015, Collective climate action: determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives, J. Environ. Psychol., 43, 155, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006 · DOI
  2. Bauwens, 2015, Propriété coopérative et acceptabilité sociale de l’éolien terrestre, Reflets Perspect. Econ., LIV, 59
  3. Bauwens, 2016, What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 13, 136, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016 · DOI
  4. Bergek, 2013, Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research, Energy Policy, 56, 568, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.038 · DOI
  5. Bergman, 2011, What role for microgeneration in a shift to a low carbon domestic energy sector in the UK?, Energy Effic., 4, 335, 10.1007/s12053-011-9107-9 · DOI
  6. Bollinger, 2012, Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels, Mark. Sci., 31, 900, 10.1287/mksc.1120.0727 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Boon, 2014, Local civil society based renewable energy organisations in the Netherlands: exploring the factors that stimulate their emergence and development, Energy Policy, 69, 297, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.046 · DOI
  8. Bowles, 2002, Social capital and community governance, Econ. J., 112, F419, 10.1111/1468-0297.00077 · DOI
  9. Brown-Kruse, 1993, Gender effects in laboratory public goods contribution, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 22, 255, 10.1016/0167-2681(93)90001-6 · DOI
  10. Castro, 2009, Ambivalence and conservation behaviour: an exploratory study on the recycling of metal cans, J. Environ. Psychol., 29, 24, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.003 · DOI
  11. Dawes, 1988, Not me or thee but we: the importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: experimental manipulations, Acta Psychol., 68, 83, 10.1016/0001-6918(88)90047-9 · DOI
  12. Dóci, 2015, “Let׳s do it ourselves” individual motivations for investing in renewables at community level, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 49, 41, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.051 · DOI
  13. Dubreuil, 2013, Are moral norms distinct from social norms? A critical assessment of Jon Elster and Cristina Bicchieri, Theory Decis., 75, 137, 10.1007/s11238-012-9342-3 · DOI
  14. Fielding, 2008, Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism, J. Environ. Psychol., 28, 318, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Fraj, 2006, Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour: an empirical analysis, J. Consum. Mark., 23, 133, 10.1108/07363760610663295 · DOI
  16. Frey, 1997, The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out, Am. Econ. Rev., 87, 746
  17. Goette, 2006, The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: evidence using random assignment to real social groups, Am. Econ. Rev., 96, 212, 10.1257/000282806777211658 · DOI
  18. Heiskanen, 2010, Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change, Energy Policy, 38, 7586, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.002 · DOI
  19. I.C.A., 1995. Statement on the cooperative identity. Review of International Cooperation, vol. 88 (3), pp. 3–4.
  20. Kalkbrenner, 2016, Citizens' willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects: the role of community and trust in Germany, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 13, 60, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.006 · DOI
  21. Kemp, 1998, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 10, 175, 10.1080/09537329808524310 · DOI
  22. Kern, 2008, Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands, Energy Policy, 36, 4093, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.018 · DOI
  23. Litvine, 2011, Helping “light green” consumers walk the talk: results of a behavioural intervention survey in the Swiss electricity market, Ecol. Econ., 70, 462, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.005 · DOI
  24. Maruyama, 2007, The rise of community wind power in Japan: enhanced acceptance through social innovation, Energy Policy, 35, 2761, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.010 · DOI
  25. McEachern, 2008, Socio-geographic perception in the diffusion of innovation: solar energy technology in Sri Lanka, Energy Policy, 36, 2578, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.020 · DOI
  26. Mignon, 2016, Investments in renewable electricity production: the importance of policy revisited, Renew. Energy, 88, 307, 10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.045 · DOI
  27. Mumford, 2010, Consumer engagement in alternative energy—can the regulators and suppliers be trusted?, Energy Policy, 38, 2664, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.054 · DOI
  28. Noll, 2014, Solar community organizations and active peer effects in the adoption of residential PV, Energy Policy, 67, 330, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.050 · DOI
  29. Rogers, 2012, Social impacts of community renewable energy projects: findings from a woodfuel case study, Energy Policy, 42, 239, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.081 · DOI
  30. Sauter, 2007, Strategies for the deployment of micro-generation: implications for social acceptance, Energy Policy, 35, 2770, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.006 · DOI
  31. Schneider, M., Frogatt, A., Thomas, S., 2011. Nuclear Power in a Post-Fukushima World, The world nuclear industry status report 2010–2011, Worldwatch Institute. · DOI
  32. Seyfang, 2013, A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK, Energy Policy, 61, 977, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030 · DOI
  33. Smil, V., 2010. Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects. ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara. · DOI
  34. Smith, 2015, Making the most of community energies: three perspectives on grassroots innovation, Environ. Plan. A
  35. Stürmer, 2003, Active citizenship: the role of community identification in community volunteerism and local participation, Psychol. Belg., 43, 103
  36. Toke, 2008, Wind power deployment outcomes: how can we account for the differences?, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 12, 1129, 10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.021 · DOI
  37. Truffer, 2003, User-led innovation processes: the development of professional car sharing by environmentally concerned citizens, Innov: Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res., 16, 139
  38. Tyler, 2001, Identity and cooperative behavior in groups, Group Process. Intergroup Relat., 4, 207, 10.1177/1368430201004003003 · DOI
  39. Walker, 2014, Community benefits, framing and the social acceptance of offshore wind farms: an experimental study in England, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 3, 46, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.003 · DOI
  40. Walker, 2008, Community renewable energy: what should it mean?, Energy Policy, 36, 497, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019 · DOI
  41. Walker, 2010, Trust and community: exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy, Energy Policy, 38, 2655, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.055 · DOI
  42. Whitmarsh, 2010, Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours, J. Environ. Psychol., 30, 305, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Wüstenhagen, 2012, Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: conceptual framework and opportunities for further research, Energy Policy, 40, 1, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.050 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Yalçın-Riollet, 2014, Energy autonomy in Le Mené: a French case of grassroots innovation, Energy Policy, 69, 347, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.016 · DOI
  45. Yildiz, 2014, Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation – the case of Germany, Renew. Energy, 68, 677, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.038 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bauwens, T.
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
93
Pages
278-290
ISSN
0301-4215
DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.017
Cited by
309
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review