Cited by 1,765Environmental Education and SustainabilityEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessClimate Change Communication and Perception

Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours

Whitmarsh, Lorraine, O'Neill, Saffron·2010·Journal of Environmental Psychology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other broader potential mechanisms such as environmental identity or moral obligation have not been encompassed.

    “Although the mediating role of CCA has been revealed, other broader potential mechanisms (such as environmental identity or moral obligation) have not been encompassed [74].”

    From The power of loss: message framing, climate anxiety, and engagement in personal carbon trading (2025) · cites this paper as [74]

    The paper’s Results (p. 19) identify pro-environmental self-identity as a predictor of several behaviours, supporting environmental identity as a potential broader mechanism. It does not establish moral obligation as a mechanism. The statement that these mechanisms were not encompassed concerns the citing study, not a finding of this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S.
Affiliations
Tyndall Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Whitmarsh, Lorraine
Venue
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
305-314
ISSN
0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082116732
Cited by
1,765
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 187 · 2025: 215 · 2024: 150 · 2023: 146 · 2022: 158 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 119 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 33
FWCI
105.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
Keywords
pro-environmental self-identity, pro-environmental behavior, spillover effects, recycling, carbon offsetting, theory of planned behavior, perceived behavioral control, subjective norms, environmental attitudes, environmental values, green self-identity, environmental policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review