Cited by 883Environmental Education and SustainabilitySocial and Intergroup PsychologyBehavioral Health and Interventions

Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism.

Fielding, Kelly S., McDonald, Rachel, Louis, Winnifred R.·2008·Journal of Environmental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R., & Louis, W. R.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Fielding, Kelly S.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
318-326
ISSN
0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098124092
Cited by
883
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 31
FWCI
40.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
theory of planned behavior, environmental activism, self-identity, intention, normative support, environmental organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review