Limits to deployment of nuclear power for decarbonization: Insights from public opinion

Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community

(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2454 · Cited by 28,717 · see citing works

Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393980 · Cited by 9,996 · see citing works

World Energy Outlook

Thring, M. W. (1977) · Electronics and Power · doi:10.1049/ep.1977.0180 · Cited by 7,338 · see citing works

How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits

Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. W., & Combs, B. (1978) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf00143739 · Cited by 2,838 · see citing works

Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community

Shapiro, R. Y. (2000) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2657613 · Cited by 2,739 · see citing works

Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values

Leiserowitz, A. (2006) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9 · Cited by 2,273 · see citing works

Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks

Flynn, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (1994) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x · Cited by 1,537 · see citing works

Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010

Gauchat, G. (2012) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122412438225 · Cited by 1,091 · see citing works

Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception

Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G. T., & Roth, C. (2000) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/0272-4332.203034 · Cited by 905 · see citing works

Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation

Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2003) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00373 · Cited by 728 · see citing works

Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology?

Clifford, S., Jewell, R., & Waggoner, P. (2015) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168015622072 · Cited by 680 · see citing works

Global Warming Gridlock

Victor, D. G. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511975714 · Cited by 591 · see citing works

Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes

Jacobson, M. Z., Delucchi, M. A., Cameron, M. A., & Frew, B. A. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1510028112 · Cited by 477 · see citing works

The Social Transformation of Trust in Government

Dalton, R. J. (2005) · International Review of Sociology · doi:10.1080/03906700500038819 · Cited by 440 · see citing works

Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997–2013

Feng, K., Davis, S. J., Sun, L., & Hubacek, K. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8714 · Cited by 421 · see citing works

Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: Exploring British public attitudes

Corner, A., Venables, D., Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Demski, C., & Pidgeon, N. (2011) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.037 · Cited by 352 · see citing works

Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste

Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N. F., Poortinga, W., & Simmons, P. (2008) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662506066719 · Cited by 315 · see citing works

The Future of Nuclear Power: Value Orientations and Risk Perception

Whitfield, S. C., Rosa, E. A., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. M. (2009) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01155.x · Cited by 314 · see citing works

Public Attitudes Toward Construction of New Power Plants

Ansolabehere, S. D., & Konisky, D. M. (2009) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfp041 · Cited by 274 · see citing works

Public perceptions and acceptance of nuclear energy in China: The role of public knowledge, perceived benefit, perceived risk and public engagement

Wang, S., Wang, J. S., Lin, S., et al. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.040 · Cited by 254 · see citing works

A critical review of global decarbonization scenarios: what do they tell us about feasibility?

Loftus, P. J., Cohen, A. M., Long, J. C. S., & Jenkins, J. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.324 · Cited by 247 · see citing works

Climate change: Embed the social sciences in climate policy

Victor, D. G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/520027a · Cited by 243 · see citing works

Energy sources, public policy, and public preferences: Analysis of US national and site-specific data

Greenberg, M. (2009) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.020 · Cited by 222 · see citing works

Living with nuclear power: Sense of place, proximity, and risk perceptions in local host communities

Venables, D., Pidgeon, N., Parkhill, K. A., Henwood, K. L., & Simmons, P. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.003 · Cited by 189 · see citing works

Linking models of human behaviour and climate alters projected climate change

Beckage, B., Gross, L. J., LaCasse, K. M., Carr, E. A., Metcalf, S. S., Winter, J. M., Howe, P. D., Fefferman, N. H., Franck, T., Zia, A., et al. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0031-7 · Cited by 185 · see citing works

Cancer in populations living near nuclear facilities. A survey of mortality nationwide and incidence in two states

Jablon, S. (1991) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.265.11.1403 · Cited by 165 · see citing works

Air Emissions Due To Wind And Solar Power

Katzenstein, W., & Apt, J. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801437t · Cited by 160 · see citing works

Human and Nature‐Caused Hazards: The Affect Heuristic Causes Biased Decisions

Siegrist, M., & Sütterlin, B. (2014) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12179 · Cited by 148 · see citing works

The changing risk perception towards nuclear power in China after the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan

Huang, L., He, R., Yang, Q., et al. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.007 · Cited by 146 · see citing works

Climate change, energy security, and risk—debating nuclear new build in Finland, France and the UK

Teräväinen, T., Lehtonen, M., & Martiskainen, M. (2011) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.041 · Cited by 138 · see citing works

Cancer near nuclear installations

Forman, D., Cook-Mozaffari, P., Darby, S. C., et al. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/329499a0 · Cited by 122 · see citing works

Informed Public Preferences for Electricity Portfolios with CCS and Other Low‐Carbon Technologies

Fleishman, L. A., de Bruin, W. B., & Morgan, M. G. (2010) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01436.x · Cited by 120 · see citing works

Affective Imagery and Acceptance of Replacing Nuclear Power Plants

Keller, C., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2011) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01691.x · Cited by 119 · see citing works

Developments in public communications on CCS

Ashworth, P., Wade, S., Reiner, D. M., & Liang, X. (2015) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.002 · Cited by 108 · see citing works

The inclusion of social aspects in power planning

Ribeiro, F. J. D. S. P., Ferreira, P., & Araújo, M. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.114 · Cited by 106 · see citing works

Cheap and clean: how Americans think about energy in the age of global warming

(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.187483 · Cited by 102 · see citing works

Nuclear power

Otway, H. J., Maurer, D., & Thomas, K. (1978) · Futures · doi:10.1016/0016-3287(78)90065-4 · Cited by 99 · see citing works

Improved representation of investment decisions in assessments of CO2 mitigation

Iyer, G. C., Clarke, L. E., Edmonds, J. A., Flannery, B. P., Hultman, N. E., McJeon, H. C., & Victor, D. G. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2553 · Cited by 92 · see citing works

Public acceptance of energy technologies: The effects of labeling, time, and heterogeneity in a discrete choice experiment

van Rijnsoever, F. J., van Mossel, A., & Broecks, K. P. F. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.040 · Cited by 92 · see citing works

Global Energy Assessment: Towards a Sustainable Future

(2013) · Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq.2013.08324caa.012 · Cited by 91 · see citing works

Energy, the Environment, and Public Opinion

Smith, E. R. A. N. (2001) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 69 · see citing works

Energy, the environment, and public opinion

(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-6396 · Cited by 69 · see citing works

Attitudes as an Expression of Knowledge and “Political Anchoring”: The Case of Nuclear Power in the United Kingdom

Costa‐Font, J., Rudisill, C., & Mossialos, E. A. (2008) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01094.x · Cited by 66 · see citing works

Effects of exemplar scenarios on public preferences for energy futures using the my2050 scenario-building tool

Demski, C., Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2017) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.27 · Cited by 58 · see citing works

Cheap and Clean: How Americans Think about Energy in the Age of Global Warming

Pralle, S. B. (2015) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.1002/polq.12404 · Cited by 50 · see citing works

Decision Support Framework for Developing Regional Energy Strategies

Bessette, D., Árvai, J., & Campbell-Árvai, V. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4036286 · Cited by 49 · see citing works

Public attitudes to nuclear energy: Salience and anxiety

van der Pligt, J. (1985) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(85)80040-2 · Cited by 40 · see citing works

The demographics of nuclear power: Comparing nuclear experts’, scientists’ and non-science professionals’ views of risks, benefits and values

Harris, J. D., Hassall, M. E., Muriuki, G., Warnaar-Notschaele, C., McFarland, E. W., & Ashworth, P. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.035 · Cited by 37 · see citing works

Cancer Risks near Nuclear Facilities: The Importance of Research Design and Explicit Study Hypotheses

Wing, S., Richardson, D. B., & Hoffmann, W. U. (2010) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1002853 · Cited by 31 · see citing works

Is Nuclear Power Just Another Environmental Issue?

Webber, D. J. (1982) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916582141004 · Cited by 31 · see citing works

Renewables and decarbonization: Studies of California, Wisconsin and Germany

Brick, S., & Thernstrom, S. (2016) · The Electricity Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tej.2016.03.001 · Cited by 31 · see citing works

The role of initial affective impressions in responses to educational communications: The case of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS).

de Bruin, W. B., & Wong‐Parodi, G. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000008 · Cited by 27 · see citing works

Climate solutions: WWF's vision for 2050.

Ayukawa, Y., Naoyuki, Y., Chen, D., et al. (2008) · Cited by 22 · see citing works

Analysis of Cancer Risks in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities

National Research Council (2012) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/13388 · Cited by 14 · see citing works

Where can I go to see one? Risk communications for an ‘imaginary technology’

Reiner, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2015.1040657 · Cited by 13 · see citing works

Energy's creative destruction

Koningstein, R., & FORK, D. K. (2014) · IEEE Spectrum · doi:10.1109/mspec.2014.6964924 · Cited by 11 · see citing works

Response to Comment on “Air Emissions Due to Wind and Solar Power”

Katzenstein, W., & Apt, J. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es901485d · Cited by 6 · see citing works

Akili: diagnosing Alzheimer's with a game [Resources_Start-Up]

Strickland, E. (2014) · IEEE Spectrum · doi:10.1109/mspec.2014.6808453 · Cited by 5 · see citing works

Assessing the Societal Implications of Emerging Technologies: Anticipatory governance in practice

Michelson, E. S. (2016) · Cited by 5 · see citing works

Assessing the societal implications of emerging technologies: anticipatory governance in practice

Loveridge, D. (2016) · foresight · doi:10.1108/fs-09-2016-0044 · Cited by 3 · see citing works

Transatomic power building a "walk-away safe" reactor

Strickland, E. (2014) · IEEE Spectrum · doi:10.1109/mspec.2014.6840794 · Cited by 2 · see citing works

Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review

Fawzy, S., Osman, A. I., Doran, J., & Rooney, D. W. (2020) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w · Cited by 1,522 · see citing works

Opposition to the Order

Whitmore, P. J. S. (1967) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-3491-3_3

Serving Away From Home: How Deployments Influence Reenlistment

Hosek, J. R., & Totten, M. E. (2002) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/mr1594 · Cited by 19 · see citing works

Large-Scale Deployment of Tablet Computers in Brazilian Public Schools: Decisive Factors and an Implementation Model

de Farias, G. F., Ally, M., & Spanhol, F. J. (2017) · Perspectives on rethinking and reforming education · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6144-8_16 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Leaders of the Opposition

Heppell, T. (2012) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230369009 · Cited by 10 · see citing works

Opposition Groups and their Influence on World Politics

Borzova, I. S. (2013) · MGIMO Review of International Relations · doi:10.24833/2071-8160-2013-2-29-47-51