The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of carbon tax efficiency in energy industries of selected EU countries
Abstract
Abstract A carbon tax is one of economic policy instruments of environmental protection supposed to contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A functional carbon tax aims at incorporating costs for elimination of environmental harm into the pricing decisions. In terms of global climate change, the carbon tax is usually imposed on the production, distribution or consumption of carbon-content fossil fuels. The main aim of the study is to evaluate the carbon tax environmental effectiveness in the energy industries of selected EU countries, namely Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Ireland and Slovenia. To achieve the principal research objective, the multiple panel regression method for the selected variables was used, the synergy of other environmental policy tools being taken into account. Control variables employed were emission allowance price, household final consumption expenditure, corporate investments, solid fuel consumption and renewable energy consumption. The analysis results suggest that the carbon tax in the energy industry is environmentally efficient, an increased tax rate allowing to reduce GHG production, which is statistically significantly affected by the consumption of fossil fuels. Based on the estimated partial regression coefficient (−0.01158), raising the carbon tax by one euro per tonne can cut annual per capita emissions by 11.58 kg.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Panel Data Econometrics in R : The plm Package
Croissant, Y., & Millo, G. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v027.i02 · Cited by 1,243
Cited by
Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses
Green, J. F. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9 · Cited by 530
Rethinking the choice of carbon tax and carbon trading in China
Jia, Z., & Lin, B. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120187 · Cited by 257
(2023) · Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change · doi:10.1017/9781009157926.004 · Cited by 253
Review of recent progress of emission trading policy in China
Huang, W., Wang, Q., Li, H., Fan, H., Qian, Y., & Klemeš, J. J. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131480 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Hájek, M., Zimmermannová, J., Helman, K., & Rozenský, L.
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 134
- Pages
- 110955
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2971467839
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of carbon tax efficiency in energy industries of selected EU countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110955
- The paper
- Hájek, M., Zimmermannová, J., Helman, K., & Rozenský, L. (2019). Analysis of carbon tax efficiency in energy industries of selected EU countries. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110955
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.