The DOI matches its Crossref record; 177 of the 177 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent advances in shuttle effect inhibition for lithium sulfur batteries
Abstract
Abstract Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are one of the most promising batteries in the future due to its high theoretical specific capacity (1675 mAh g−1) and energy density (2600 Wh kg−1). However, the severe capacity fading caused by shuttle effect of polysulfide needs to be addressed before the practical application of Li-S batteries. In this review, we summarized the formation mechanism and the corresponding inhibition strategies of shuttle effect. The formation of polysulfide shuttle effect is classified into five steps: (i) formation of long-chain polysulfide, (ii) detaching of polysulfide from sulfur host, (iii) dissolution of polysulfide into electrolyte, (iv) migration of polysulfide toward lithium anode side, and (v) reaction between polysulfide and lithium anode. The corresponding strategies are reviewed and discussed step by step according to the shuttle effect formation steps of polysulfide. Evaluation and perspective of the current strategies are also discussed in this review in order to provide new view points for researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future
Chu, S., & Majumdar, A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11475 · Cited by 12,550
Two‐Dimensional Nanocrystals Produced by Exfoliation of Ti3AlC2
Naguib, M., Kurtoglu, M., Presser, V., Lu, J., Niu, J., Heon, M., Hultman, L., Gogotsi, Y., & Barsoum, M. W. (2011) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201102306 · Cited by 11,855
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage
Larcher, D., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2015) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2085 · Cited by 7,872
A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries
Ji, X., Lee, K. T., & Nazar, L. F. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2460 · Cited by 5,988
Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S.-H., Zu, C., & Su, Y.-S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500062v · Cited by 4,665
Ionic-liquid materials for the electrochemical challenges of the future
Armand, M., Endres, F., MacFarlane, D. R., Ohno, H., & Scrosati, B. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2448 · Cited by 4,619
Designing high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries
Seh, Z. W., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., & Cui, Y. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00410a · Cited by 2,573
Challenges and Prospects of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., & Su, Y.-S. (2013) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar300179v · Cited by 2,380
Advances in lithium–sulfur batteries based on multifunctional cathodes and electrolytes
Pang, Q., Liang, X., Kwok, C. Y., & Nazar, L. F. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.132 · Cited by 2,167
Cited by
Li-S Batteries: Challenges, Achievements and Opportunities
Raza, H., Bai, S., Cheng, J., Majumder, S., Zhu, H., Liu, Q., Zheng, G., Li, X., & Chen, G. (2023) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-023-00188-4 · Cited by 406
Li, S., Zhang, W., Zheng, J., Lv, M., Song, H., & Du, L. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202000779 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Ren, W., Ma, W., Zhang, S., & Tang, B.
- Venue
- Energy Storage Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- 707-732
- ISSN
- 2405-8289 (ISSN-L)
- 2405-8297
- OpenAlex
- W2915292726
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 177
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances in shuttle effect inhibition for lithium sulfur batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.02.022
- The paper
- Ren, W., Ma, W., Zhang, S., & Tang, B. (2019). Recent advances in shuttle effect inhibition for lithium sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.02.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
