The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stubble burning: Effects on health & environment, regulations and management practices
Open accessAbstract
Stubble burning has been reckoned among the major contributors of air pollution especially in South Asia. It is a significant source of gaseous pollutants such as, carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and methane (CH4) as well as particulate matters (PM10 and PM2.5) causing serious damage to human health and the environment. It was reported that the burning of 63 Mt of crop stubble releases 3.4 Mt of CO, 0.1 Mt of NOx, 91 Mt of CO2, 0.6 Mt of CH4 and 1.2 Mt of PM into the atmosphere. The situation is more austere in India due to the intensive rice-wheat rotation system which generates large amount of stubble. It was estimated that about 352 Mt of stubble is generated each year in India out of which 22% and 34% are contributed by wheat and rice stubble respectively. About 84 Mt (23.86%) of the stubble is burnt on-field each year immediately after harvest. The disastrous haze observed over India during the winter season has been linked to stubble burning as it coincides with the burning periods (October-November). During this time, most Indian cities, especially within the National Capital Region (NCR) experience harsh pollution often reaching the severe levels of the air quality index (AQI). In November 2019, Delhi recorded a peak AQI of 487, Ghaziabad reported an AQI as high as 493, and Greater Noida recorded 480. The health effects of air pollution ranges from skin and eyes irritation to severe neurological, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchitis, lung capacity loss, emphysema, cancer, etc. It also leads to an increase in mortality rates due to the prolonged exposure to high pollution. The Energy and Resources Institute (2019) reported that in 2012, air pollution had led to about 5 million deaths in South Asia which is around 22% of the total deaths in the region. In addition to its effects on air quality, stubble burning also affects soil fertility (through the destruction of its nutrients), economic development and climate. The crop stubbles (if managed properly) could provide immense economic benefits to the farmers and protect the environment from the severe pollution. Some of the alternative management practices include the incorporation of the stubble into the soil, use of stubble as fuel in power plants, use as raw material for pulp and paper industries, or as biomass for biofuel production. It can also be used to generate compost and biochar, or as blend for the production of cement and bricks. Most of the farmers in North India are not aware of the prolific alternatives for managing stubble and, therefore, consider burning as the best option. This necessitates the need for immense awareness programs to enlighten the farmers about the availability of economically feasible options and the composite effects of stubble burning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale
Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D., & Pozzer, A. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15371 · Cited by 5,977
Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years.
Carlsen, E., Giwercman, A., Keiding, N., & Skakkebaek, N. E. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.305.6854.609 · Cited by 2,768
Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., & Nizkorodov, S. A. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5006167 · Cited by 1,832
Department of economic and social affairs
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2025) · Energy Statistics Pocketbook · doi:10.18356/9789211069280c001 · Cited by 689
Air Pollutant Emissions from Rice Straw Open Field Burning in India, Thailand and the Philippines
Gadde, B., Bonnet, S., Menke, C., & Garivait, S. (2009) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2009.01.004 · Cited by 683
An assessment of biofuel use and burning of agricultural waste in the developing world
Yevich, R., & Logan, J. A. (2003) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2002gb001952 · Cited by 661
Emission of Air Pollutants from Crop Residue Burning in India
Jain, N., Bhatia, A., & Pathak, H. (2014) · Aerosol and Air Quality Research · doi:10.4209/aaqr.2013.01.0031 · Cited by 631
Bioenergy potential from crop residue biomass in India
Hiloidhari, M., Das, D., & Baruah, D. C. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.025 · Cited by 530
Air pollution trends over Indian megacities and their local-to-global implications
Gurjar, B. R., Ravindra, K., & Nagpure, A. S. (2016) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.030 · Cited by 425
Ravindra, K., Singh, T., & Mor, S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.031 · Cited by 400
Cited by
Biomass derived functional carbon materials for supercapacitor applications
Rawat, S., Mishra, R. K., & Bhaskar, T. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131961 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdurrahman, M. I., Chaki, S., & Saini, G.
- Venue
- Environmental Advances
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 100011
- ISSN
- 2666-7657 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3094180394
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stubble burning: Effects on health & environment, regulations and management practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envadv.2020.100011
- The paper
- Abdurrahman, M. I., Chaki, S., & Saini, G. (2020). Stubble burning: Effects on health & environment, regulations and management practices. Environmental Advances. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2020.100011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.