Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Plant responses to elevated CO2Plant Stress Responses and TolerancePlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Foliage type specific susceptibility to ozone in Picea abies, Pinus cembra and Larix decidua at treeline: A synthesis

Wieser, Gerhard, Hecke, Karin, Tausz, Michael, Matyssek, Rainer·2013·Environmental and Experimental Botany
DOI 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.09.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.09.013

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Havranek, W.M., Wieser, G., 1990. Research design to measure ozone uptake and its effects on gas exchange in spruce in the field. In: Payer, H.D., Pfirrmann, T., Mathy, P, (Eds.), Environmental Research with Plants in Closed Chambers. Air pollution research report 26. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, pp. 148–152.
  2. Tranquillini, 1979, Physiological ecology of the alpine timberline, vol. 31
  3. Volger, E., 1995. Zur Ozonempfindlichkeit der europäischen Lärche (Larix decidua Mill.) an der Waldgrenze. Diploma Thesis, Innsbruck University.
  4. Wieser, 2002, The role of antioxidative defense in determining ozone sensitivity of Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) Karst.) across tree age: implications for the sun- and shade crown, Phyton, 42, 245

Cited by

  • Ecological and conceptual consequences of Arctic pollution

    Kirdyanov, A. V., Krusic, P. J., Shishov, V. V., Vaganov, E. A., Fertikov, A. I., Myglan, V. S., Barinov, V. V., Browse, J., Esper, J., Ilyin, V. A., et al. (2020) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13611 · Cited by 60

    “Since larch foliage has a greater specific leaf area, higher stomatal conductance and lower water use efficiency than spruce (Kloeppel et al., 1998), it might be particularly sensitive to ozone damage (Wieser et al., 2013).”
    Background

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Wieser, G., Hecke, K., Tausz, M., & Matyssek, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Graz (AT)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Wieser, Gerhard
ORCID
Venue
Environmental and Experimental Botany
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
90
Pages
4-11
ISSN
0098-8472 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.09.013
OpenAlex
W2093227954
Cited by
17
References
77
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Environmental and Experimental Botany (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
ozone sensitivity, ozone uptake, ozone flux, Norway spruce, Pinus cembra, Larix decidua, specific leaf area, photosynthetic capacity, vitamin C, alpha-tocopherol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foliage type specific susceptibility to ozone in Picea abies, Pinus cembra and Larix decidua at treeline: A synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.09.013
The paper
Wieser, G., Hecke, K., Tausz, M., & Matyssek, R. (2013). Foliage type specific susceptibility to ozone in Picea abies, Pinus cembra and Larix decidua at treeline: A synthesis. Environmental and Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.09.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.