Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 592

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta‐analysis

Open access
WITTIG, VICTORIA E., AINSWORTH, ELIZABETH A., NAIDU, SHAWNA L., KARNOSKY, DAVID F., LONG, STEPHEN P.·2009·Global Change Biology

Abstract

The northern hemisphere temperate and boreal forests currently provide an important carbon sink; however, current tropospheric ozone concentrations ([O 3]) and [O 3] projected for later this century are damaging to trees and have the potential to reduce the carbon sink strength of these forests. This meta‐analysis estimated the magnitude of the impacts of current [O 3] and future [O 3] on the biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry of trees representative of northern hemisphere forests. Current ambient [O 3] (40 ppb on average) significantly reduced the total biomass of trees by 7% compared with trees grown in charcoal‐filtered (CF) controls, which approximate preindustrial [O 3]. Above‐ and belowground productivity were equally affected by ambient [O 3] in these studies. Elevated [O 3] of 64 ppb reduced total biomass by 11% compared with trees grown at ambient [O 3] while elevated [O 3] of 97 ppb reduced total biomass of trees by 17% compared with CF controls. The root‐to‐shoot ratio was significantly reduced by elevated [O 3] indicating greater sensitivity of root biomass to [O 3]. At elevated [O 3], trees had significant reductions in leaf area, Rubisco content and chlorophyll content which may underlie significant reductions in photosynthetic capacity. Trees also had lower transpiration rates, and were shorter in height and had reduced diameter when grown at elevated [O 3]. Further, at elevated [O 3], gymnosperms were significantly less sensitive than angiosperms. There were too few observations of the interaction of [O 3] with elevated [CO 2] and drought to conclusively project how these climate change factors will alter tree responses to [O 3]. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the carbon‐sink strength of northern hemisphere forests is likely reduced by current [O 3] and will be further reduced in future if [O 3] rises. This implies that a key carbon sink currently offsetting a significant portion of global fossil fuel CO 2 emissions could be diminished or lost in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01774.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 592

Metadata

Authors
WITTIG, V. E., AINSWORTH, E. A., NAIDU, S. L., KARNOSKY, D. F., & LONG, S. P.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01-16
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
396-424
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2060784343
Cited by
592
References
3
FWCI
21.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01774.x
The paper
WITTIG, V. E., AINSWORTH, E. A., NAIDU, S. L., KARNOSKY, D. F., & LONG, S. P. (2009). Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta‐analysis. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01774.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.