The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta‐analysis
Open accessAbstract
The northern hemisphere temperate and boreal forests currently provide an important carbon sink; however, current tropospheric ozone concentrations ([O 3]) and [O 3] projected for later this century are damaging to trees and have the potential to reduce the carbon sink strength of these forests. This meta‐analysis estimated the magnitude of the impacts of current [O 3] and future [O 3] on the biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry of trees representative of northern hemisphere forests. Current ambient [O 3] (40 ppb on average) significantly reduced the total biomass of trees by 7% compared with trees grown in charcoal‐filtered (CF) controls, which approximate preindustrial [O 3]. Above‐ and belowground productivity were equally affected by ambient [O 3] in these studies. Elevated [O 3] of 64 ppb reduced total biomass by 11% compared with trees grown at ambient [O 3] while elevated [O 3] of 97 ppb reduced total biomass of trees by 17% compared with CF controls. The root‐to‐shoot ratio was significantly reduced by elevated [O 3] indicating greater sensitivity of root biomass to [O 3]. At elevated [O 3], trees had significant reductions in leaf area, Rubisco content and chlorophyll content which may underlie significant reductions in photosynthetic capacity. Trees also had lower transpiration rates, and were shorter in height and had reduced diameter when grown at elevated [O 3]. Further, at elevated [O 3], gymnosperms were significantly less sensitive than angiosperms. There were too few observations of the interaction of [O 3] with elevated [CO 2] and drought to conclusively project how these climate change factors will alter tree responses to [O 3]. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the carbon‐sink strength of northern hemisphere forests is likely reduced by current [O 3] and will be further reduced in future if [O 3] rises. This implies that a key carbon sink currently offsetting a significant portion of global fossil fuel CO 2 emissions could be diminished or lost in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · cited 5×
“A weighted random-effects model was used, where each individual response was weighted by the reciprocal of the observed pooled variance (Gurevitch & Hedges, 1999; Hedges et al., 1999), to examine the effects of the categorical levels described in Table 1 on total biomass, leaf biomass, leaf area, aboveground-woody bio…”
MethodResultInfluentialCanadell, J. G., Le Quéré, C., Raupach, M. R., Field, C. B., Buitenhuis, E. T., Ciais, P., Conway, T. J., Gillett, N. P., Houghton, R. A., & Marland, G. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702737104 · Cited by 2,136 · cited 2×
“Canadell et al. (2007) suggested that the observed strength of this sink might be declining.”
BackgroundIndirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink
Sitch, S., Cox, P. M., Collins, W. J., & Huntingford, C. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06059 · Cited by 1,019
Cited by
China׳s international trade and air pollution in the United States
Lin, J., Pan, D., Davis, S. J., Zhang, Q., He, K., Wang, C., Streets, D. G., Wuebbles, D. J., & Guan, D. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1312860111 · Cited by 482
Growing season extension affects ozone uptake by European forests
Anav, A., De Marco, A., Friedlingstein, P., Savi, F., Sicard, P., Sitch, S., Vitale, M., & Paoletti, E. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.020 · Cited by 46
Impact of ground-level ozone on Mediterranean forest ecosystems health
Jakovljević, T., Lovreškov, L., Jelić, G., Anav, A., Popa, I., Fornasier, M. F., Proietti, C., Limić, I., Butorac, L., Vitale, M., et al. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147063 · Cited by 28
Wieser, G., Hecke, K., Tausz, M., & Matyssek, R. (2013) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.09.013 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- WITTIG, V. E., AINSWORTH, E. A., NAIDU, S. L., KARNOSKY, D. F., & LONG, S. P.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01-16
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 396-424
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2060784343
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01774.x
- The paper
- WITTIG, V. E., AINSWORTH, E. A., NAIDU, S. L., KARNOSKY, D. F., & LONG, S. P. (2009). Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta‐analysis. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01774.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.