Cited by 1,472Energy, Environment, Agriculture AnalysisSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Carbon emission from farm operations

Lal, R·2004·Environment International

Abstract

This manuscript is a synthesis of the available information on energy use in farm operations, and its conversion into carbon equivalent (CE). A principal advantage of expressing energy use in terms of carbon (C) emission as kg CE lies in its direct relation to the rate of enrichment of atmospheric concentration of CO2. Synthesis of the data shows that estimates of emissions in kg CE/ha are 2-20 for different tillage operations, 1-1.4 for spraying chemicals, 2-4 for drilling or seeding and 6-12 for combine harvesting. Similarly, estimates of C emissions in kg CE/kg for different fertilizer nutrients are 0.9-1.8 for N, 0.1-0.3 for P2O5, 0.1-0.2 for K20 and 0.03-0.23 for lime. Estimates of C emission in kg CE/kg of active ingredient (a.i.) of different pesticides are 6.3 for herbicides, 5.1 for insecticides and 3.9 for fungicides. Irrigation, lifting water from deep wells and using sprinkling systems, emits 129+/-98 kg CE for applying 25 cm of water and 258+/-195 for 50 cm of water. Emission for different tillage methods are 35.3 kg CE/ha for conventional till, 7.9 kg CE/ha for chisel till or minimum till, and 5.8 kg CE/ha for no-till method of seedbed preparation. In view of the high C costs of major inputs, sustainable management of agricultural ecosystems implies that an output/input ratio, expressed either as gross or net output of C, must be >1 and has an increasing trend over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lal, R.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lal, R
ORCID
Lal, R
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
981-990
ISSN
0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123098628
Cited by
1,472
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 101 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 51
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environment International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
CO2 emissions, agricultural energy use, carbon equivalent, tillage systems, no-tillage, pesticide emissions, herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, fertilizer emissions, irrigation, elevated CO2, sustainable agriculture, output-input ratio
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Atmosphere, Calcium Sulfate, Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, Fertilizers, Pesticides, Water, Greenhouse Effect, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review