Carbon emission from farm operations
Abstract
This manuscript is a synthesis of the available information on energy use in farm operations, and its conversion into carbon equivalent (CE). A principal advantage of expressing energy use in terms of carbon (C) emission as kg CE lies in its direct relation to the rate of enrichment of atmospheric concentration of CO2. Synthesis of the data shows that estimates of emissions in kg CE/ha are 2-20 for different tillage operations, 1-1.4 for spraying chemicals, 2-4 for drilling or seeding and 6-12 for combine harvesting. Similarly, estimates of C emissions in kg CE/kg for different fertilizer nutrients are 0.9-1.8 for N, 0.1-0.3 for P2O5, 0.1-0.2 for K20 and 0.03-0.23 for lime. Estimates of C emission in kg CE/kg of active ingredient (a.i.) of different pesticides are 6.3 for herbicides, 5.1 for insecticides and 3.9 for fungicides. Irrigation, lifting water from deep wells and using sprinkling systems, emits 129+/-98 kg CE for applying 25 cm of water and 258+/-195 for 50 cm of water. Emission for different tillage methods are 35.3 kg CE/ha for conventional till, 7.9 kg CE/ha for chisel till or minimum till, and 5.8 kg CE/ha for no-till method of seedbed preparation. In view of the high C costs of major inputs, sustainable management of agricultural ecosystems implies that an output/input ratio, expressed either as gross or net output of C, must be >1 and has an increasing trend over time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These data are similar to those collected by others (West and Marland 2002, Lal 2004).
“These data are similar to those collected by others (West and Marland 2002, Lal”
From LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF NET GREENHOUSE-GAS FLUX FOR BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS (2007) · cites this paper as Lal 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom
Bateman, I. J., Harwood, A. R., Mace, G. M., Watson, R. T., Abson, D. J., Andrews, B., Binner, A., Crowe, A., Day, B. H., Dugdale, S., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234379 · Cited by 1,031 · see citing works
Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest
Gelfand, I., Sahajpal, R., Zhang, X., Izaurralde, R. C., Gross, K. L., & Robertson, G. P. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11811 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF NET GREENHOUSE-GAS FLUX FOR BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS
Adler, P. R., Grosso, S. J. D., & Parton, W. J. (2007) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/05-2018 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions?
Fajardy, M., & Mac Dowell, N. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee00465f · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Crop residues as soil amendments and feedstock for bioethanol production
Lal, R. (2008) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.023 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationHILLIER, J., WHITTAKER, C., DAILEY, G., AYLOTT, M., CASELLA, E., RICHTER, G. M., RICHE, A., MURPHY, R., TAYLOR, G., & SMITH, P. (2009) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01021.x · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Enhancing ecosystem services with no-till
Lal, R. (2013) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170512000452 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationPryor, S. W., Smithers, J., Lyne, P., & van Antwerpen, R. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.069 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Mine spoil acts as a sink of carbon dioxide in Indian dry tropical environment
Tripathi, N., Singh, R. S., & Nathanail, C. P. (2014) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.024 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Carbon Life Cycle Assessment for Prairie as a Crop in Reclaimed Mine Land
Guzman, J. G., Lal, R., Byrd, S., Apfelbaum, S. I., & Thompson, R. L. (2016) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.2291 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationAboveground productivity and soil carbon storage of biofuel crops in<scp>O</scp>hio
Bonin, C. L., & Lal, R. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12041 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, B., Zhang, L., Lu, F., Deng, L., Zhao, H., Luo, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, K., Wang, X., Liu, W., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.184 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lal, R.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lal, R
- ORCID
- Lal, R
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 981-990
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123098628
- Cited by
- 1,472
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 101 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environment International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Keywords
- CO2 emissions, agricultural energy use, carbon equivalent, tillage systems, no-tillage, pesticide emissions, herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, fertilizer emissions, irrigation, elevated CO2, sustainable agriculture, output-input ratio
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Atmosphere, Calcium Sulfate, Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, Fertilizers, Pesticides, Water, Greenhouse Effect, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review