Cited by 215Bioenergy crop production and managementBiofuel production and bioconversionSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Crop residues as soil amendments and feedstock for bioethanol production

Lal, R.·2008·Waste Management

Abstract

Traditional solid fuels account for more than 90% of the energy supply for 3 billion people in developing countries. However, liquid biofuels (e.g., ethanol) are perceived as an important alternative to fossil fuel. Global crop residue production is estimated at about 4 billion Mg for all crops and 3 billion Mg per annum for lignocellulosic residues of cereals. One Mg of corn stover can produce 280L of ethanol, compared with 400L from 1Mg of corn grains; 1Mg of biomass is also equivalent to 18.5GJ of energy. Thus, 3 billion Mg of residues are equivalent to 840 billion L of ethanol or 56x10(9)GJ of energy. However, removal of crop residues exacerbates soil degradation, increases net emission of CO2, and aggravates food insecurity. Increasing the SOC pool by 1 Mg C ha(-1)yr(-1) through residue retention on soil can increase world food grain production by 24-40 million Mg yr(-1), and root/tuber production by 6-11 million Mg yr(-1). Thus, identifying alternate sources of biofuel feedstock (e.g., biofuel plantations, animal waste, municipal sold waste) is a high priority. Establishing biofuel plantations on agriculturally marginal or degraded lands can off-set 3.5-4 Pg Cyr(-1).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.023

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Except for a few literature reports, the effects caused by wheat straw removal for bioethanol production purposes are neglected in most bioethanol LCA studies.

    “Except for a few literature reports [19,20], the effects caused by wheat straw removal for bioethanol production purposes are neglected in most bioethanol LCA studies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lal, R.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lal, R.
ORCID
Lal, R.
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
747-758
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064572418
Cited by
215
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
19.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
crop residues, bioethanol, lignocellulosic biomass, soil organic carbon, residue retention, soil degradation, food security, biofuel feedstock, corn stover, CO2 emissions
MeSH terms
Ethanol, Animals, Carbon, Energy-Generating Resources, Poaceae, Manure, Soil, Waste Products, Biomass, Crops, Agricultural

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review