Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,618

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human‐Carnivore Conflict and Perspectives on Carnivore Management Worldwide

TREVES, ADRIAN, KARANTH, K. ULLAS·2003·Conservation Biology
DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract: Carnivore conservation depends on the sociopolitical landscape as much as the biological landscape. Changing political attitudes and views of nature have shifted the goals of carnivore management from those based on fear and narrow economic interests to those based on a better understanding of ecosystem function and adaptive management. In parallel, aesthetic and scientific arguments against lethal control techniques are encouraging the development of nonlethal approaches to carnivore management. We anticipate greater success in modifying the manner and frequency with which the activities of humans and domestic animals intersect with those of carnivores. Success should permit carnivore populations to persist for decades despite human population growth and modification of habitat.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Andelt W. F., 2001, Effectiveness of livestock guarding animals for reducing predation on livestock, Endangered Species Update, 18, 182
  2. Andersone Z., 2000, First results of public involvement in wolf research in Latvia, Folia Therologica Estonica, 5, 7
  3. Angst C., 2001, Electric fencing of fallow deer enclosures in Switzerland–a predator‐proof method, Carnivore Damage Prevention News, 3, 8
  4. Beier P., 1991, Cougar attacks on humans in the United States and Canada, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 19, 403
  5. Berg K. A.1998.The future of the wolf in Minnesota: control sport or protection? Pages40–44inN.Fascione editor.Proceedings of the restoring the wolf conference. Defenders of Wildlife Washington D.C.
  6. Boumez J. B., 1989, Coyote control in Alberta, Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop, 9, 40
  7. Burns R. J., 1996, Effectiveness of large livestock protection collars against depredating coyotes, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 24, 123
  8. Caro T. M., 1995, The importance of behavioral ecology for conservation biology: examples from Serengeti carnivores, 451
  9. Coppinger R., 1988, A decade of use of livestock guarding dogs, Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 13, 209
  10. Corbett J., 1954, The man‐eating leopard of Rudrapayang
  11. Evans W., 1983, The cougar in New Mexico: biology, status, depredation of livestock and management recommendations
  12. Faraizl S. D., 1996, A profile of depredating mountain lions, Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference, 17, 88
  13. Forbes S. E. W. R.Forbes R. E.Wilson andR. M.Reinhold.1998.Spatial distribution of wolf support. Pages94–99inN.Fascione editor.Proceedings of the restoring the wolf conference. Defenders of Wildlife Washington D.C.
  14. Fox C. H., 2001, Taxpayers say “no” to killing predators, Animal Issues, 32, 1
  15. Green J. S., 1989, Bear‐people conflicts–Proceedings of a symposium on management strategies, 49
  16. Halfpenny J. C., 1991, Mountain lion‐human interaction symposium and workshop, 10
  17. Harbo S. J., 1983, Wolves in Canada and Alaska: their status, biology and management, 51
  18. Hoogesteijn R. H., 1993, Jaguar predation and conservation: cattle mortality caused by felines on three ranches in the Venezuelan llanos, Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 65, 391
  19. Horstman L. P., 1982, Black bear predation on livestock in Alberta, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 10, 34
  20. Hötte M., 2001, Compensation for livestock kills by tigers and leopards in Russia, Carnivore Damage Prevention News, 3, 6
  21. Jackson P., 1996, Problems and possible solutions in management of felid predators, Journal of Wildlife Research, 1, 304
  22. Jackson R., 2001, Linking snow leopard conservation and people‐wildlife conflict resolution: grassroots measures to protect the endangered snow leopard from herder retribution, Endangered Species Update, 18, 138
  23. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00354.x · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00354.x
  24. Jorgensen C. J., 1979, Bear‐sheep interactions, Targhee National Forest, International Conference on Bear Research and Management, 5, 191
  25. Jorgensen C. J., 1978, Management of black bear depredation problems, Proceedings of the Eastern Workshop on Black Bear Management and Research, 4, 297
  26. Kaczensky P., 1999, Large carnivore depredation on livestock in Europe, Ursus, 11, 59
  27. Karanth K. U., 2002, Making parks work: identifying key factors to implementing parks in the tropics, 189
  28. Karanth K. U., 2002, Making parks work: identifying key factors to implementing parks in the tropics, 250
  29. 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00451.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00451.x
  30. Linhart S. B., 1984, Efficacy of light and sound stimuli for reducing coyote predation upon pastured sheep, Protection Ecology, 6, 75
  31. Linton D.1998.Wolves and humans on the Olympic Peninsula: a brief history of interspecific relations. Pages6–13inN.Fascione editor.Proceedings of the restoring the wolf conference. Defenders of Wildlife Washington D.C.
  32. Manfredo M. J., 1998, Public acceptance of mountain lion management: a case study of Denver, Colorado, and nearby foothill areas, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26, 964
  33. Mansfield T. M., 1991, Mountain lion‐human interaction symposium and workshop, 75
  34. Mason J. R., 2001, Chemical repellents and other aversive strategies in predation management, Endangered Species Update, 18, 175
  35. Mech L. D., 2000, Assessing factors that may predispose Minnesota farms to wolf depredations on cattle, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28, 623
  36. Montag J., 2003, Compensation and predator conservation: limitations of compensation, Carnivore Damage Prevention News, 6, 2
  37. Newby F., 1958, A new approach to predator management in Montana, Montana Wildlife, 8, 22
  38. 10.1016/0006-3207(93)90001-H · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(93)90001-h
  39. Polisar J.2000.Jaguars pumas their prey base and cattle ranching: ecological perspectives of a management issue.Ph.D. thesis. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation University of Florida Gainesville .
  40. Rabinowitz A. R., 1986, Jaguar predation on domestic livestock in Belize, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 14, 170
  41. Rangarajan M., 2001, India's wildlife history
  42. Sanyal P., 1987, Tigers of the world, 427
  43. Shelton M., 1984, The use of conventional and electric fencing to reduce coyote predation on sheep and goats
  44. 10.1080/090647000750069502 · doi:10.1080/090647000750069502
  45. Stahl P., 2001, Factors influencing lynx depredation on sheep in France: problem individuals and habitat, Carnivore Damage Prevention News, 4, 6
  46. Stowell L. R., 1992, Bear damage to agriculture in Wisconsin, Proceedings of the Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference, 5, 96
  47. Suminski H. R., 1982, Mountain lion predation on domestic livestock in Nevada, Vertebrate Pest Conference, 10, 62
  48. 10.2981/wlb.1998.019 · doi:10.2981/wlb.1998.019
  49. Theberge J. B., 1985, Models of wolf‐ungulate relationships: when is wolf control justified, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 13, 449
  50. Thompson B. C., 1978, Fence‐crossing behavior exhibited by coyotes, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 6, 14
  51. Tompa F. S., 1983, Wolves in Canada and Alaska: their status, biology and management, 112
  52. Torres S. G., 1996, Mountain lion and human activity in California: testing speculations, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 24, 457
  53. Treves A., 2002, Wolf justice: managing human‐carnivore conflict in the 21st century, Wolf Print, 13, 6
  54. Turnbull‐Kemp P., 1967, The leopard
  55. 10.2307/3802649 · doi:10.2307/3802649
  56. 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00241.x · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00241.x · Paper page
  57. Wydeven A. P., 2004, Predators and people: from conflict to conservation

Cited by

See all 1,618

Metadata

Authors
TREVES, A., & KARANTH, K. U.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-12
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
1491-1499
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
DOI
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x
OpenAlex
W2092494720
Cited by
1,618
References
49
FWCI
23.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human‐Carnivore Conflict and Perspectives on Carnivore Management Worldwide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x
The paper
TREVES, A., & KARANTH, K. U. (2003). Human‐Carnivore Conflict and Perspectives on Carnivore Management Worldwide. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.