The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Water footprint scenarios for 2050: A global analysis
Open accessAbstract
This study develops water footprint scenarios for 2050 based on a number of drivers of change: population growth, economic growth, production/trade pattern, consumption pattern (dietary change, bioenergy use) and technological development. The objective the study is to understand the changes in the water footprint (WF) of production and consumption for possible futures by region and to elaborate the main drivers of this change. In addition, we assess virtual water flows between the regions of the world to show dependencies of regions on water resources in other regions under different possible futures. We constructed four scenarios, along two axes, representing two key dimensions of uncertainty: globalization versus regional selfsufficiency, and economy-driven development versus development driven by social and environmental objectives. The study shows how different drivers will change the level of water consumption and pollution globally in 2050. The presented scenarios can form a basis for a further assessment of how humanity can mitigate future freshwater scarcity. We showed with this study that reducing humanity's water footprint to sustainable levels is possible even with increasing populations, provided that consumption patterns change. This study can help to guide corrective policies at both national and international levels, and to set priorities for the years ahead in order to achieve sustainable and equitable use of the world's fresh water resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global food security under climate change
Schmidhuber, J., & Tubiello, F. N. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701976104 · Cited by 2,128
Food consumption trends and drivers
Kearney, J. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0149 · Cited by 1,987
Cited by
Four billion people facing severe water scarcity
Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500323 · Cited by 5,531
Self-citationCountry-level and gridded estimates of wastewater production, collection, treatment and reuse
Jones, E. R., van Vliet, M. T. H., Qadir, M., & Bierkens, M. F. P. (2021) · Earth system science data · doi:10.5194/essd-13-237-2021 · Cited by 829
Sustainable Ammonia Production Processes
Ghavam, S., Vahdati, M., Wilson, I. A. G., & Styring, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2021.580808 · Cited by 561
Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources
Davis, K. F., Gephart, J. A., Emery, K. A., Leach, A. M., Galloway, J. N., & D’Odorico, P. (2016) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.004 · Cited by 444
Water Footprint Assessment: Evolvement of a New Research Field
Hoekstra, A. Y. (2017) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1618-5 · Cited by 382
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ercin, A. E., & Hoekstra, A. Y.
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 71-82
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140811232
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Water footprint scenarios for 2050: A global analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2013.11.019
- The paper
- Ercin, A. E., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2014). Water footprint scenarios for 2050: A global analysis. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.11.019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.