The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linking high resolution mass spectrometry data with exposure and toxicity forecasts to advance high-throughput environmental monitoring
Open accessAbstract
There is a growing need in the field of exposure science for monitoring methods that rapidly screen environmental media for suspect contaminants. Measurement and analysis platforms, based on high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), now exist to meet this need. Here we describe results of a study that links HRMS data with exposure predictions from the U.S. EPA's ExpoCast™ program and in vitro bioassay data from the U.S. interagency Tox21 consortium. Vacuum dust samples were collected from 56 households across the U.S. as part of the American Healthy Homes Survey (AHHS). Sample extracts were analyzed using liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-TOF/MS) with electrospray ionization. On average, approximately 2000 molecular features were identified per sample (based on accurate mass) in negative ion mode, and 3000 in positive ion mode. Exact mass, isotope distribution, and isotope spacing were used to match molecular features with a unique listing of chemical formulas extracted from EPA's Distributed Structure-Searchable Toxicity (DSSTox) database. A total of 978 DSSTox formulas were consistent with the dust LC-TOF/molecular feature data (match score≥90); these formulas mapped to 3228 possible chemicals in the database. Correct assignment of a unique chemical to a given formula required additional validation steps. Each suspect chemical was prioritized for follow-up confirmation using abundance and detection frequency results, along with exposure and bioactivity estimates from ExpoCast and Tox21, respectively. Chemicals with elevated exposure and/or toxicity potential were further examined using a mixture of 100 chemical standards. A total of 33 chemicals were confirmed present in the dust samples by formula and retention time match; nearly half of these do not appear to have been associated with house dust in the published literature. Chemical matches found in at least 10 of the 56 dust samples include Piperine, N,N-Diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET), Triclocarban, Diethyl phthalate (DEP), Propylparaben, Methylparaben, Tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl)phosphate (TDCPP), and Nicotine. This study demonstrates a novel suspect screening methodology to prioritize chemicals of interest for subsequent targeted analysis. The methods described here rely on strategic integration of available public resources and should be considered in future non-targeted and suspect screening assessments of environmental and biological media.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wild, C. P. (2005) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-05-0456 · Cited by 2,562
Kind, T., & Fiehn, O. (2007) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-105 · Cited by 1,201
Black Pepper and its Pungent Principle-Piperine: A Review of Diverse Physiological Effects
Srinivasan, K. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408390601062054 · Cited by 821
Krauss, M., Singer, H., & Hollender, J. (2010) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3608-9 · Cited by 743 · cited 2×
“Non-targeted screening involves the detection of analytes in samples given no a priori information — that is, no list of suspected or targeted chemicals (Krauss et al., 2010; Schymanski et al., 2014; Zedda and Zwiener, 2012).”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
Nontarget Screening with High Resolution Mass Spectrometry in the Environment: Ready to Go?
Hollender, J., Schymanski, E. L., Singer, H. P., & Ferguson, P. L. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b02184 · Cited by 733
OPERA models for predicting physicochemical properties and environmental fate endpoints
Mansouri, K., Grulke, C. M., Judson, R. S., & Williams, A. J. (2018) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-018-0263-1 · Cited by 624
Self-citationFluorinated Compounds in U.S. Fast Food Packaging
Schaider, L. A., Balan, S. A., Blum, A., Andrews, D. Q., Strynar, M. J., Dickinson, M. E., Lunderberg, D. M., Lang, J. R., & Peaslee, G. F. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00435 · Cited by 620
Self-citationLiu, Y., D'Agostino, L. A., Qu, G., Jiang, G., & Martin, J. W. (2019) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2019.02.021 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Rager, J. E., Strynar, M. J., Liang, S., McMahen, R. L., Richard, A. M., Grulke, C. M., Wambaugh, J. F., Isaacs, K. K., Judson, R., Williams, A. J., & Sobus, J. R.
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 88
- Pages
- 269-280
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2286180017
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking high resolution mass spectrometry data with exposure and toxicity forecasts to advance high-throughput environmental monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.008
- The paper
- Rager, J. E., Strynar, M. J., Liang, S., McMahen, R. L., Richard, A. M., Grulke, C. M., Wambaugh, J. F., Isaacs, K. K., Judson, R., Williams, A. J., & Sobus, J. R. (2016). Linking high resolution mass spectrometry data with exposure and toxicity forecasts to advance high-throughput environmental monitoring. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.