Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Brominated flame retardants in the indoor environment — Comparative study of indoor contamination from three countries

Open access
Venier, Marta, Audy, Ondřej, Vojta, Šimon, Bečanová, Jitka, Romanak, Kevin, Melymuk, Lisa, Krátká, Martina, Kukučka, Petr, Okeme, Joseph, Saini, Amandeep, Diamond, Miriam L., Klánová, Jana·2016·Environment International

Abstract

Concentrations of more than 20 brominated flame retardants (FRs), including polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and emerging FRs, were measured in air, dust and window wipes from 63 homes in Canada, the Czech Republic and the United States in the spring and summer of 2013. Among the PBDEs, the highest concentrations were generally BDE-209 in all three matrices, followed by Penta-BDEs. Among alternative FRs, EHTBB and BEHTBP were detected at the highest concentrations. DBDPE was also a major alternative FR detected in dust and air. Bromobenzenes were detected at lower levels than PBDEs and other alternative FRs; among the bromobenzenes, HBB and PBEB were the most abundant compounds. In general, FR levels were highest in the US and lowest in the Czech Republic - a geographic trend that reflects the flame retardants' market. No statistically significant differences were detected between bedroom and living room FR concentrations in the same house (n=10), suggesting that sources of FRs are widespread indoors and mixing between rooms. The concentrations of FRs in air, dust, and window film were significantly correlated, especially for PBDEs. We found a significant relationship between the concentrations in dust and window film and in the gas phase for FRs with log KOA values <14, suggesting that equilibrium was reached for these but not compounds with log KOA values >14. This hypothesis was confirmed by a large discrepancy between values predicted using a partitioning model and the measured values for FRs with log KOA values >14.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.029

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Venier, M., Audy, O., Vojta, Š., Bečanová, J., Romanak, K., Melymuk, L., Krátká, M., Kukučka, P., Okeme, J., Saini, A., Diamond, M. L., & Klánová, J.
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
94
Pages
150-160
ISSN
0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2414057052
Cited by
165
References
0
FWCI
13.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brominated flame retardants in the indoor environment — Comparative study of indoor contamination from three countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.029
The paper
Venier, M., Audy, O., Vojta, Š., Bečanová, J., Romanak, K., Melymuk, L., Krátká, M., Kukučka, P., Okeme, J., Saini, A., Diamond, M. L., & Klánová, J. (2016). Brominated flame retardants in the indoor environment — Comparative study of indoor contamination from three countries. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.029

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.