The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Brominated flame retardants in the indoor environment — Comparative study of indoor contamination from three countries
Open accessAbstract
Concentrations of more than 20 brominated flame retardants (FRs), including polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and emerging FRs, were measured in air, dust and window wipes from 63 homes in Canada, the Czech Republic and the United States in the spring and summer of 2013. Among the PBDEs, the highest concentrations were generally BDE-209 in all three matrices, followed by Penta-BDEs. Among alternative FRs, EHTBB and BEHTBP were detected at the highest concentrations. DBDPE was also a major alternative FR detected in dust and air. Bromobenzenes were detected at lower levels than PBDEs and other alternative FRs; among the bromobenzenes, HBB and PBEB were the most abundant compounds. In general, FR levels were highest in the US and lowest in the Czech Republic - a geographic trend that reflects the flame retardants' market. No statistically significant differences were detected between bedroom and living room FR concentrations in the same house (n=10), suggesting that sources of FRs are widespread indoors and mixing between rooms. The concentrations of FRs in air, dust, and window film were significantly correlated, especially for PBDEs. We found a significant relationship between the concentrations in dust and window film and in the gas phase for FRs with log KOA values <14, suggesting that equilibrium was reached for these but not compounds with log KOA values >14. This hypothesis was confirmed by a large discrepancy between values predicted using a partitioning model and the measured values for FRs with log KOA values >14.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Review of Environmental Occurrence, Fate, and Toxicity of Novel Brominated Flame Retardants
Xiong, P., Yan, X., Zhu, Q., Qu, G., Shi, J., Liao, C., & Jiang, G. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03159 · Cited by 382
Personal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Appalachian mining communities
Hendryx, M., Wang, S., Romanak, K. A., Salamova, A., & Venier, M. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113501 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Venier, M., Audy, O., Vojta, Š., Bečanová, J., Romanak, K., Melymuk, L., Krátká, M., Kukučka, P., Okeme, J., Saini, A., Diamond, M. L., & Klánová, J.
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 94
- Pages
- 150-160
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2414057052
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brominated flame retardants in the indoor environment — Comparative study of indoor contamination from three countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.029
- The paper
- Venier, M., Audy, O., Vojta, Š., Bečanová, J., Romanak, K., Melymuk, L., Krátká, M., Kukučka, P., Okeme, J., Saini, A., Diamond, M. L., & Klánová, J. (2016). Brominated flame retardants in the indoor environment — Comparative study of indoor contamination from three countries. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.