Cited by 1,282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes

Morgan, Rebecca L., Whaley, Paul, Thayer, Kristina A., Schünemann, Holger J.·2018·Environment International

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.015

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Armstrong, 2007, vol. 2
  2. Cohen, 2017, Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015, Lancet, 389, 1907, 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2013, Guidelines for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management
  4. Deeks, 2010, Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making, EFSA J., 8, 1
  5. Guyatt, 2011, GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 64, 395, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Lindgren, 2008, Hearing status among commercial pilots in a Swedish airline company, Int. J. Audiol., 47, 515, 10.1080/14992020802064633 · DOI
  7. Morgan, 2016, GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health, Environ. Int., 92-93, 611, 10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.004 · DOI
  8. Morgan R.L., Thayer K.A., Santesso N., Holloway A.C., Blain R., Eftim S., Goldstone A.E., Ross P., Guyatt G., Schünemann H.J.: Need for an instrument to evaluate Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Exposure: rationale and preliminary instrument. Environ. Int. (Under review).
  9. Schunemann, 2001, The relation of serum levels of antioxidant vitamins C and E, retinol and carotenoids with pulmonary function in the general population, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 163, 1246, 10.1164/ajrccm.163.5.2007135 · DOI
  10. Schunemann, 2001, Epidemiologic evidence linking antioxidant vitamins to pulmonary function and airway obstruction, Epidemiol. Rev., 23, 248, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a000805 · DOI
  11. Schunemann, 2002, Lung function in relation to intake of carotenoids and other antioxidant vitamins in a population-based study, Am. J. Epidemiol., 155, 463, 10.1093/aje/155.5.463 · DOI
  12. Selander, 2016, Maternal occupational exposure to noise during pregnancy and hearing dysfunction in children: a nationwide prospective cohort study in Sweden, Environ. Health Perspect., 124, 855, 10.1289/ehp.1509874 · DOI
  13. Thabane, 2009, Posing the research question: not so simple, Can. J. Anesth., 56, 71, 10.1007/s12630-008-9007-4 · DOI
  14. Theodoratou, 2014, Vitamin D and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised trials, BMJ, 348, g2035, 10.1136/bmj.g2035 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Tikka, 2017, Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,282

Metadata

Authors
Morgan, R. L., Whaley, P., Thayer, K. A., & Schünemann, H. J.
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
121
Pages
1027-1031
ISSN
0160-4120
Cited by
1,282
References
4
Language
en
Funders
McMaster University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review