Cited by 79Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Artificial sweeteners as potential tracers of municipal landfill leachate

Roy, James W., Van Stempvoort, Dale R., Bickerton, Greg·2014·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

Artificial sweeteners are gaining acceptance as tracers of human wastewater in the environment. The 3 artificial sweeteners analyzed in this study were detected in leachate or leachate-impacted groundwater at levels comparable to those of untreated wastewater at 14 of 15 municipal landfill sites tested, including several closed for >50 years. Saccharin was the dominant sweetener in old (pre-1990) landfills, while newer landfills were dominated by saccharin and acesulfame (introduced 2 decades ago; dominant in wastewater). Cyclamate was also detected, but less frequently. A case study at one site illustrates the use of artificial sweeteners to identify a landfill-impacted groundwater plume discharging to a stream. The study results suggest that artificial sweeteners can be useful tracers for current and legacy landfill contamination, with relative abundances of the sweeteners potentially providing diagnostic ability to distinguish different landfills or landfill cells, including crude age-dating, and to distinguish landfill and wastewater sources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.08.021

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining information about when specific artificial sweeteners were introduced or withdrawn and the years of operation of a landfill can help distinguish multiple sources of OWCs in groundwater and can also be used to age-date landfill plumes.

    “Combining information about when specific artificial sweeteners were introduced or withdrawn and the years of operation of a landfill can help distinguish multiple sources of OWCs in groundwater and can also be used to age-date landfill plumes (Van Stempvoort et al., 2011;Roy et al., 2014).”
  • Artificial sweeteners are also common in landfill leachate, with concentrations up to 85 μg/L acesulfame and 620 μg/L sucralose.

    “While acesulfame and sucralose have been considered specific markers of wastewater in aquatic systems (Buerge et al., 2009), artificial sweeteners are also common in landfill leachate, with concentrations up to 85 μg/L acesulfame (Roy et al., 2014) and 620 μg/L sucralose (Clarke et al., 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roy, J. W., Van Stempvoort, D. R., & Bickerton, G.
Affiliations
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Roy, James W.
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
184
Pages
89-93
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052903278
Cited by
79
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
artificial sweeteners, landfill leachate, groundwater contamination, tracers, saccharin, acesulfame, cyclamate, legacy contamination, river discharge
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Sweetening Agents, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Groundwater, Wastewater, Waste Disposal Facilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review