Cited by 55Fire effects on ecosystemsForest Management and PolicyClimate Change Policy and Economics

Up in smoke: California's greenhouse gas reductions could be wiped out by 2020 wildfires

Open access
Jerrett, Michael, Jina, Amir S., Marlier, Miriam E.·2022·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

In this short communication, we estimate that California's wildfire carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions from 2020 are approximately two times higher than California's total greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions since 2003. Without considering future vegetation regrowth, CO2e emissions from the 2020 wildfires could be the second most important source in the state above either industry or electrical power generation. Regrowth may partly of fully occur over a long period, but due to exigencies of the climate crisis most of the regrowth will not occur quickly enough to avert greater than 1.5 degrees of warming. Global monetized damages caused by CO2e from in 2020 wildfire emissions amount to some $7.1 billion USD. Our analysis suggests that significant societal benefits could accrue from larger investments in improved forest management and stricter controls on new development in fire-prone areas at the wildland-urban interface.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119888

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • California plans to treat 1 million acres of forestland annually to help restore forests to more healthy stand conditions.

    “California plans to treat 1 million acres of forestland annually, helping to restore forests to more healthy stand conditions (Forest Management Task [12, 22]).”

    From DIY mass timber: development of low-tech and low-cost structural mass timber manufacturing to support forest utilization in California (2025) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Conclusions state that California and the federal government agreed to increase forest treatment to 1 million acres per year to prevent wildfires. They do not say that the treatments will restore forests to healthier stand conditions; that part of the claim is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. California Air Resources Board (CARB), 2017. California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, pp. 1-132.
  2. Feo, T.J., Evans, S., Mace, A.J., Brady, S.E., Lindsey, B., 2020. The Costs of Wildfire in California: an Independent Review of Scientific and Technical Information. California Council on Science and Technology. California Council on Science and Technology, pp. 1-248.
  3. IPCC, 2018. Global Warming of 1.5 • C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 • C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways. In: The Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA.
  4. State of California, 2020. USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region. Agreement for Shared Stewardship of California's Forest and Rangelands, pp. 1-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jerrett, M., Jina, A. S., & Marlier, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Jerrett, Michael
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
310
Pages
119888
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4289942728
Cited by
55
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Chicago (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
wildfire emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, CO2 equivalent, vegetation recovery, forest management, wildland-urban interface, climate change mitigation
MeSH terms
Greenhouse Gases, Wildfires, California, Carbon Dioxide, Greenhouse Effect, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review