Cited by 54Heavy metals in environmentFire effects on ecosystemsCoal and Its By-products

Suburban areas in flames: dispersion of potentially toxic elements from burned vegetation and buildings. Estimation of the associated ecological and human health risk

Alexakis, Dimitrios E.·2020·Environmental Research

Abstract

The results of the assessment of burned residential and wildland areas associated with the July 2018 western Attica wildfire are summarised. The dispersion of major and trace elements in a fire impacted suburban landscape which is adjacent in the north with a Natura 2000 area is evaluated. The dataset includes 35 elements and 27 sampling sites spatially distributed in wildland and residential areas. Field observations and a macroscopic method were applied for investigating the wildfire severity. Statistical and spatial analysis tools were used for data treatment. Major and trace element contents were compared to levels and criteria provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment and Australian Department of Environment and Conservation. Aluminum, As, Co, Fe, Mn, Ni, Sb and Zn concentrations observed in wildfire ash pose potential risk to human health. Median ash concentrations for Al, As, B, Ba, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, S, Sb, and Zn exceeds the plant-avian-mammalian screening levels in wildland and residential areas. Geogenic or anthropogenic origin of the elements is discussed. The associated health risk on human health and terrestrial ecological receptors (plant, avian, mammalian) is assessed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109153

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of wildfire ash are wide-ranging, and its mobilization can pose a risk to human health, including respiratory problems through ash inhalation by firefighters, post-fire restoration teams, and the public nearby or downwind.

    “The effects of wildfire ash are wide-ranging, and its mobilization can also pose a risk to human health.These include, for example, respiratory problems through ash inhalation by firefighters or post-fire restoration teams, and to the public nearby or downwind of active fires and recently burnt areas (e.g., Alexakis, 2020;Wan et al., 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexakis, D. E.
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
183
Pages
109153
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3002562692
Cited by
54
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of West Attica
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
Keywords
wildfire ash, potentially toxic elements, suburbs, burned vegetation, burned buildings, human health risk, environmental risk assessment, trace elements, heavy metals, aluminum, arsenic, lead, zinc, source apportionment, Natura 2000
MeSH terms
Animals, Australia, Canada, Environmental Health, Environmental Monitoring, Fires, Humans, Trace Elements, Risk Assessment, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review