Cited by 172Microplastics and Plastic PollutionPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 274 of the 276 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Source, Distribution and Emerging Threat of Micro-and Nanoplastics to marine Organism and Human Health: Socio-Economic Impact and Management Strategies

Abstract

The nature of micro- and nanoplastics and their harmful consequences has drawn significant attention in recent years in the context of environmental protection. Therefore, this paper aims to provide an overview of the existing literature related to this evolving subject, focusing on the documented human health and marine environment impacts of micro- and nanoplastics and including a discussion of the economic challenges and strategies to mitigate this waste problem. The study highlights the micro- and nanoplastics distribution across various trophic levels of the food web, and in different organs in infected animals which is possible due to their reduced size and their lightweight, multi-coloured and abundant features. Consequently, micro- and nanoplastics pose significant risks to marine organisms and human health in the form of cytotoxicity, acute reactions, and undesirable immune responses. They affect several sectors including aquaculture, agriculture, fisheries, transportation, industrial sectors, power generation, tourism, and local authorities causing considerable economic losses. This can be minimised by identifying key sources of environmental plastic contamination and educating the public, thus reducing the transfer of micro- and nanoplastics into the environment. Furthermore, the exploitation of the potential of microorganisms, particularly those from marine origins that can degrade plastics, could offer an enhanced and environmentally sound approach to mitigate micro- and nanoplastics pollution.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110857

Cites

274 of 274 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–274 of 274

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Alimi, 2017, vol. 52
  2. Bouwmeester, 2015, Potential health impact of environmentally released micro-and nanoplastics in the human food production chain: experiences from nanotoxicology, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 8932, 10.1021/acs.est.5b01090 · DOI
  3. Cole, 2015, vol. 49
  4. Della Torre, 2014, Accumulation and embryotoxicity of polystyrene nanoparticles at early stage of development of sea urchin embryos Paracentrotus lividus, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12302, 10.1021/es502569w · DOI · Paper page
  5. Eo, 2018, Abundance, composition, and distribution of microplastics larger than 20 μm in sand beaches of South Korea, Environ. Pollut., 238, 894, 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.096 · DOI
  6. Green, 2016, Effects of microplastics on European flat oysters, Ostrea edulis and their associated benthic communities, Environ. Pollut., 216, 95, 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.043 · DOI
  7. Guillet, 1988, vol. 195, 18
  8. Hall, 2000, Impacts of marine debris and oil: economic and social costs to coastal communities, Kommunenes Internasjonale Miljøorganisasjon
  9. Kaposi, 2013, vol. 48
  10. Kashiwada, 2006, Distribution of nanoparticles in the see-through medaka (Oryzias latipes), Environ. Health Perspect., 114, 1697, 10.1289/ehp.9209 · DOI
  11. Lenz, 2016, vol. 113, E4121
  12. Maes, 2017, A rapid-screening approach to detect and quantify microplastics based on fluorescent tagging with Nile Red, Sci. Rep., 7, 44501, 10.1038/srep44501 · DOI
  13. Mattsson, 2018, Chapter 13 - nanoplastics in the aquatic environment, 379
  14. Mu, 2019, Microplastics abundance and characteristics in surface waters from the northwest pacific, the bering sea, and the chukchi sea, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 43, 58, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.04.023 · DOI
  15. Nel, 2015, A quantitative analysis of microplastic pollution along the south-eastern coastline of South Africa, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 101, 274, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.043 · DOI
  16. Ng, 2018, vol. 627
  17. Peng, 2018, Microplastics in freshwater river sediments in Shanghai, China: a case study of risk assessment in mega-cities, 234, 448
  18. Peng, 2020, Micro-and nano-plastics in marine environment: source, distribution and threats—a review, Sci. Total Environ., 698, 134254, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134254 · DOI
  19. Sana, 2020, Effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on marine environment and human health, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser., 1
  20. Singh, 2016, Biodegradation of polythenes by bacteria isolated from soil, Int. J. Res. Dev. Pharm. Life Sci., 5, 2056
  21. Sjollema, 2016, vol. 170, 259
  22. Terepocki, 2017, Size and dynamics of microplastic in gastrointestinal tracts of northern fulmars (fulmarus glacialis) and sooty shearwaters (ardenna grisea), Mar. Pollut. Bull., 116, 143, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.12.064 · DOI
  23. Trivedi, 2016, Role of microbes in degradation of synthetic plastics and manufacture of bioplastics, J. Chem. Pharmaceut. Res., 8, 211
  24. von Moos, 2012, Uptake and effects of microplastics on cells and tissue of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis L. After an experimental exposure, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 11327, 10.1021/es302332w · DOI · Paper page
  25. Wagner, 2014, Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: what we know and what we need to know, Environ. Sci. Eur., 26, 12, 10.1186/s12302-014-0012-7 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Wallace, 1989, How much do commercial and recreational fishermen know about marine debris and entanglement? Part 1, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Marine Debris, 2
  27. Watts, 2015, vol. 49
  28. Zhang, 2017, vol. 199, 74
  29. Zhang, 2016, vol. 219

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Mofijur, M., Ahmed, S. F., Rahman, S. M. A., Arafat Siddiki, S. Y., Islam, A. B. M. S., Shahabuddin, M., Ong, H. C., Mahlia, T. M. I., Djavanroodi, F., & Show, P. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Asian University for Women (BD)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
  • Federation University (AU)
  • Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University (SA)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Ahmed, S.F.
  • Show, Pau Loke
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
195
Pages
110857
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128064446
Cited by
172
References
276
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University
  • Department of Sport and Recreation, Government of Western Australia
  • University of Dammam
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
microplastics, nanoplastics, marine plastic pollution, human health risk, marine organisms, trophic transfer, cytotoxicity, immune response, socio-economic impacts, plastic waste management, plastic-degrading microorganisms, aquaculture, fisheries, public education
MeSH terms
Microplastics, Animals, Humans, Plastics, Socioeconomic Factors, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Aquatic Organisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review