CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 224Social Science and Policy ResearchPolicy Transfer and LearningResearch, Science, and Academia

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science–policy interface

Open access
Wesselink, Anna, Buchanan, Karen S., Georgiadou, Yola, Turnhout, Esther·2013·Environmental Science & Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.008

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hoppe, R., Wesselink, A., Cairns, R. Lost in the problem: the role of boundary organisations in the social status of climate change knowledge. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 224

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wesselink, A., Buchanan, K. S., Georgiadou, Y., & Turnhout, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (NL)
Corresponding author
Wesselink, Anna
ORCID
Venue
Environmental Science & Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
30
Pages
1-9
ISSN
1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.008
OpenAlex
W2026935191
Cited by
224
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7
FWCI
101.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
Keywords
science-policy interface, environmental governance, policy discourse, technical expertise, scientific knowledge claims, green growth, sustainability assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review