Cited by 318Water-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesWater Governance and InfrastructureInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Anatomy of a buzzword: The emergence of ‘the water-energy-food nexus’ in UK natural resource debates

Open access
Cairns, Rose, Krzywoszynska, Anna·2016·Environmental Science & Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.007

Cites

68 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cairns and Krzywoszynska (2016) identify the nexus as a contested 'buzzword' but solely focus on UK natural resource debates, which may differ from international ones.

    “Cairns and Krzywoszynska (2016) identify the nexus as contested 'buzzword' (ibid. p. 164) but solely focus on UK natural resource debates, which may differ from international ones.”

    From What Is Driving the Water-Energy-Food Nexus? Discourses, Knowledge, and Politics of an Emerging Resource Governance Concept (2018) · cites this paper as Cairns and Krzywoszynska, 2016

    The Abstract (p. 2) calls the nexus a buzzword, and the Introduction (p. 4) says the paper examines how its terminology is mobilised and contested in UK natural resource debates. But “solely” overstates its scope: the Introduction also says it explores connections with international environmental and science-policy debates. The paper does not establish that UK debates differ from international ones. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ambiguity of concepts like the nexus make them susceptible to processes of appropriation by powerful actors to suit particular agendas.

    “The ambiguity of concepts like the nexus make them susceptible to processes of appropriation by powerful actors to suit particular agendas (Cairns and Krzywoszynska, 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Andrews-Speed, P., Bleischwitz, R., Boersma, T., Johnson, C., Kemp, G., VanDeveer, S.D., 2014. Want , Waste or War ? Earthscan -Routledge, Oxon.
  2. Bonn2011 Conference, 2011. Bonn2011 Conference : The Water , Energy and Food Security Nexus Solutions for a Green Economy.
  3. Harris, F., Lyon, F., 2014. Transdisciplinary environmental research: a review of approaches to knowledge co-production, Thinkpiece Series. Brighton.
  4. Hoff, H., 2011. Understanding the Nexus. Background Paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus. Stockholm.
  5. NERC, 2012. Report of a workshop entitled 'Avoiding the Perfect Storm: Water Food Energy Nexus', organised by the NERC Water Security Knowledge Exchange programme. Exeter.
  6. World Economic Forum, 2011. Water Security: The Water-Food-Energy-Climate Nexus. doi:10.5822/978-1-61091-026-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cairns, R., & Krzywoszynska, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Krzywoszynska, Anna
Venue
Environmental Science & Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
64
Pages
164-170
ISSN
1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2485702452
Cited by
317
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
19.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
ESRC as part of the ESRC Nexus Network
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
water-energy-food nexus, buzzwords, natural resource policy, integration, power relations, transdisciplinary research, science-policy interface, efficiency improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review