Cited by 137Multi-Criteria Decision MakingHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesWater resources management and optimization

Concepts of decision support for river rehabilitation

Reichert, P., Borsuk, M., Hostmann, M., Schweizer, S., Spörri, C., Tockner, K., Truffer, B.·2007·Environmental Modelling & Software

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.017

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Techniques such as decision analysis, visualization, participant appraisals, household surveys, monetary choice experiments, and ethnographic interviews may reveal residents' preferences for the future state of the urban hydrosystem and their perception of cultural and other ecosystem services.

    “All those may reveal the residents' preferences for future state of the urban hydrosystem, and their perception of cultural and other ecosystem services.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reichert, P., Borsuk, M., Hostmann, M., Schweizer, S., Spörri, C., Tockner, K., & Truffer, B.
Affiliations
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Corresponding author
Reichert, P.
Venue
Environmental Modelling & Software
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
188-201
ISSN
1364-8152 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118753458
Cited by
137
References
63
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Modelling & Software (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eidgenössische Anstalt für Wasserversorgung Abwasserreinigung und Gewässerschutz
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Water resources management and optimization
Keywords
river restoration, decision support, decision analysis, stakeholder engagement, preference elicitation, environmental management, consensus building, stakeholder conflict, uncertainty analysis, transparency in decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review