Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A sawtooth-like timeline for the first billion years of lunar bombardment

Open access
Morbidelli, A., Marchi, S., Bottke, W.F., Kring, D.A.·2012·Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Abstract

Abstract We revisit the early evolution of the Moon's bombardment. Our work combines modeling (based on plausible projectile sources and their dynamical decay rates) with constraints from the lunar crater record, radiometric ages of the youngest lunar basins, and the abundance of highly siderophile elements in the lunar crust and mantle. We deduce that the evolution of the impact flux did not decline exponentially over the first billion years of lunar history, but also there was no prominent and narrow impact spike ∼ 3.9 Gy ago, unlike that typically envisioned in the lunar cataclysm scenario. Instead, we show the timeline of the lunar bombardment has a sawtooth-like profile, with an uptick in the impact flux near ∼ 4.1 Gy ago. The impact flux at the beginning of this weaker cataclysm was 5–10 times higher than the immediately preceding period. The Nectaris basin should have been one of the first basins formed at the sawtooth. We predict the bombardment rate since ∼ 4.1 Gy ago declined slowly and adhered relatively close to classic crater chronology models ( Neukum and Ivanov, 1994 ). Overall we expect that the sawtooth event accounted for about one-fourth of the total bombardment suffered by the Moon since its formation. Consequently, considering that ∼ 12 – 14 basins formed during the sawtooth event, we expect that the net number of basins formed on the Moon was ∼ 45 – 50 . From our expected bombardment timeline, we derived a new and improved lunar chronology suitable for use on pre-Nectarian surface units. According to this chronology, a significant portion of the oldest lunar cratered terrains has an age of 4.38–4.42 Gyr. Moreover, the largest lunar basin, South Pole Aitken, is older than 4.3 Gy, and therefore was not produced during the lunar cataclysm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.07.037

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Morbidelli, A., Marchi, S., Bottke, W. F., & Kring, D. A.
Venue
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
355-356
Pages
144-151
ISSN
0012-821X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023997504
Cited by
265
References
5
FWCI
12.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A sawtooth-like timeline for the first billion years of lunar bombardment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.07.037
The paper
Morbidelli, A., Marchi, S., Bottke, W. F., & Kring, D. A. (2012). A sawtooth-like timeline for the first billion years of lunar bombardment. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.07.037

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.