The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Situation Awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems
Endsley, M. R. (1995) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872095779049499 · Cited by 2,039
Situation awareness during driving: Explicit and implicit knowledge in dynamic spatial memory.
Gugerty, L. J. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.3.1.42 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Situation Awareness in Anesthesia: Concept and Research
Schulz, C. M., Endsley, M. R., Kochs, E. F., Gelb, A. W., & Wagner, K. J. (2013) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e318280a40f · Cited by 257
Operator training simulators in virtual reality environment for process operators: a review
Patle, D. S., Manca, D., Nazir, S., & Sharma, S. (2019) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-018-0354-3 · Cited by 95
Grier, R. A. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343412444606 · Cited by 37
The Evolving Definition of Cognitive Readiness for Military Operations
Fletcher, J. D., & Wind, A. P. (2014) · Teaching and Measuring Cognitive Readiness · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7579-8_2 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Salmon, P. M., Stanton, N. A., Walker, G. H., Jenkins, D., Ladva, D., Rafferty, L., & Young, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 490-500
- ISSN
- 0169-8141 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072645635
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
