One-handed thumb interaction of mobile devices from the input accuracy perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another challenge for mobile interaction is the need for visual attention.
“Another challenge for mobile interaction is the need for visual attention [54].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [54]
Topic-based and list-based backnavigation enabled faster access to previous page and improved navigation experience.
“The study found that topicbased and list-based backnavigation enabled faster access to previous page and improved navigation experience.”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [54]
Input accuracy of thumb interaction increases as the size of the key increases.
“Similar to index finger interaction, input accuracy of thumb interaction increased as the size of the key increases, and the key must be located within the areas that can be easily reached by a thumb, which were the bottom-left, the center, and the upper-right area [100].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [100]
The key must be located within thumb-reachable areas: bottom-left, center, and upper-right.
“Similar to index finger interaction, input accuracy of thumb interaction increased as the size of the key increases, and the key must be located within the areas that can be easily reached by a thumb, which were the bottom-left, the center, and the upper-right area [100].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [100]
Four factors impact accuracy of thumb-based interaction: key size, key location, thumb length, and user age.
“A few studies looked into designs for thumb-based interaction and found that there were four factors that impacted accuracy of thumb-based interaction: the size of the key, key location, thumb length, and user age [100,101].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [100]
Cites
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
Fitts, P. M. (1954) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055392 · Cited by 6,466 · see citing works
Reading text from computer screens
Mills, C. B., & Weldon, L. J. (1987) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/45075.46162 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Touch a Screen or Turn a Knob: Choosing the Best Device for the Job
Rogers, W. A., Fisk, A. D., McLaughlin, A. C., & Pak, R. (2005) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/0018720054679452 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review
Punchoojit, L., & Hongwarittorrn, N. (2017) · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1155/2017/6787504 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Effects of age, thumb length and screen size on thumb movement coverage on smartphone touchscreens
Xiong, J., & Muraki, S. (2016) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2015.11.004 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
- Authors
- Park, Y. S., & Han, S. H.
- Affiliations
- Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Han, Sung H.
- ORCID
- Han, Sung H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 746-756
- ISSN
- 0169-8141 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984277003
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
- Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010-0000364)
- National Research Foundation of Korea
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- mobile devices, input offset, success rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
