Cited by 58Interactive and Immersive DisplaysErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersUsability and User Interface Design

Effects of age, thumb length and screen size on thumb movement coverage on smartphone touchscreens

Xiong, Jinghong, Muraki, Satoshi·2016·International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ergon.2015.11.004

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiong, J., & Muraki, S.
Affiliations
Kyushu University (JP)
Corresponding author
Xiong, Jinghong
Venue
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
53
Pages
140-148
ISSN
0169-8141 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2182183579
Cited by
58
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
thumb length, screen size, age differences, elderly users, hand posture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review