The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual and manual loadings with QWERTY-like ambiguous keyboards: Relevance of letter-key assignments on mobile phones
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The results indicated that simple and designed stimuli were most promising.”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [61]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, stimuli with fast, clear, and sharp responses were good choice for the haptic button edge.”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [61]
In the citing paper
“Some other novel techniques include lens gestures [117], multistroked gesture [118], ambiguous keyboard input [119,120], effect of key size [115], and five-key text-entry technique [121].”
From Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review (2017) · cites this paper as [120]
Citations
Cites
Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.
Hyman, R. (1953) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056940 · Cited by 1,443
The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1980) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358886.358895 · Cited by 1,174
Designing Displays for Older Adults
Pak, R., & McLaughlin, A. (2010) · doi:10.1201/b10316 · Cited by 112
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Arnott, 1992, Probabilistic character disambiguation for reduced keyboards using small text samples, Augment. Altern. Commun., 8, 215, 10.1080/07434619212331276203 · DOI
- Back, 2010, Applying CPM-GOMS analysis for predicting and explaining two-handed Korean text entry task on mobile phone, Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet., 54, 977, 10.1177/154193121005401312 · DOI
- Colle, 2004, Standing at a kiosk: effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference, Ergonomics, 47, 1406, 10.1080/00140130410001724228 · DOI
- Dunlop, 2008, Investigating five key predictive text entry with combined distance and keystroke modelling, Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 12, 589, 10.1007/s00779-007-0179-7 · DOI
- Drury, 1992, A model for movement time on data-entry keyboards, Ergonomics, 35, 129, 10.1080/00140139208967802 · DOI
- Egeth, 1973, Factors affecting processing mode in visual search, Percept. Psychophys., 13, 394, 10.3758/BF03205792 · DOI
- Egeth, 1972, Parallel processing of multielement displays, Cogn. Psychol., 3, 674, 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90026-6 · DOI
- Fitts, 1954, The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement, J. Exp. Psychol., 47, 381, 10.1037/h0055392 · DOI · Paper page
- Foulds, 1987, Statistical disambiguation of multi-character keys applied to reduce motor requirements for augmentative and alternative communication, Augment. Altern. Commun., 3, 192, 10.1080/07434618712331274509 · DOI
- Gan, 1988, Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually controlled movements, Ergonomics, 31, 829, 10.1080/00140138808966724 · DOI
- Gold, 2012, Postures, typing strategies, and gender differences in mobile device usage: an observational study, Appl. Ergon., 43, 408, 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.015 · DOI
- Hamblin, 2003, The effects of perceptual grouping on text entry performance, vol. 47, 1703
- Hick, 1952, On the rate of gain of information, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 4, 11, 10.1080/17470215208416600 · DOI · Paper page
- Hoffmann, 1995, Data-entry keyboard geometry and keying movement times, Ergonomics, 38, 940, 10.1080/00140139508925161 · DOI
- Leong, 2011, Ballistic movements on data-entry keypads, Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 41, 180, 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.01.004 · DOI
- Lesher, 1998, Optimal character arrangements for ambiguous keyboards, IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng., 6, 415, 10.1109/86.736156 · DOI
- Li, 2006, A heuristic-based approach to optimize keyboard design for single-finger keying applications, Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 36, 695, 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.04.009 · DOI
- MacKenzie, 1989, A note on the information-theoretic basis for Fitts' law, J. Mot. Behav., 21, 323, 10.1080/00222895.1989.10735486 · DOI
- MacKenzie, 2001, An empirical investigation of the novice experience with soft keyboards, Behav. Inf. Technol., 20, 411, 10.1080/01449290110089561 · DOI
- MacKenzie, 1999, Text entry using soft keyboards, Behav. Inf. Technol., 18, 235, 10.1080/014492999118995 · DOI
- Miró-Borrás, 2009, Ambiguous keyboards and scanning: the relevance of the cell selection phase, vol. 5727, 1
- Norman, 1982, Why alphabetic keyboards are not easy to use: keyboard layout doesn't much matter, Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc., 24, 509, 10.1177/001872088202400502 · DOI
- Palmer, 1992, Common region: a new principle of perceptual grouping, Cogn. Psychol., 24, 436, 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90014-S · DOI
- Park, 2010, Touch key design for one-handed thumb interaction with a mobile phone: effects of touch key size and touch key location, Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 40, 68, 10.1016/j.ergon.2009.08.002 · DOI
- Park, 2010, One-handed thumb interaction of mobile devices from the input accuracy perspective, Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 40, 746, 10.1016/j.ergon.2010.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Sandnes, 2007, Bimanual text entry using game controllers: relying on users' spatial familiarity with QWERTY, Interact. Comput., 19, 140, 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.08.003 · DOI
- Schedlbauer, 2007, Effects of key size and spacing on the completion time and accuracy of input tasks on soft keypads using trackball and touch input, vol. 51, 429
- Sears, 2001, The role of visual search in the design of effective soft keyboards, Behav. Inf. Technol., 20, 159, 10.1080/01449290110049790 · DOI
- Soukoreff, 1995, Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speed using a stylus and a soft keyboard, Behav. Inf. Technol., 14, 370, 10.1080/01449299508914656 · DOI
- Tan, 2003, Development of a qwerty-type reduced keyboard system for mobile computing: tengo, vol. 47, 855
- Trudeau, 2012, Thumb motor performance varies with thumb and wrist posture during single-handed mobile phone use, J. Biomechanics, 45, 2348
- Wu, 2014, New chording text entry methods combining physical and virtual buttons on a mobile phone, Appl. Ergon., 45, 825, 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.10.011 · DOI
- Yatani, 2009, An evaluation of stylus-based text entry methods on handheld devices studied in different user mobility states, Pervasive Mob. Comput., 5, 496, 10.1016/j.pmcj.2009.04.002 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review
Punchoojit, L., & Hongwarittorrn, N. (2017) · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1155/2017/6787504 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, Y.-C., & Wu, F.-G.
- Affiliations
- National Cheng Kung University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Yu-Chun
- ORCID
- Huang, Yu-Chun
- Venue
- International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 143-150
- ISSN
- 0169-8141 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1160178337
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Keywords
- visual search, manual operation, key size, touchscreen keyboards
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review