The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Broussard, K. M., Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2000) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587792 · Cited by 8,193
Self-citationFormulaic Language and the Lexicon
Wray, A. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511519772 · Cited by 2,873 · cited 9×
“In fact, there have been few studies that directly investigate whether any word sequences are truly pre-fabricated: ‘stored and retrieved whole from memory . . .’ (Wray, 2002, p. 9).”
BackgroundInfluentialEllis, N. C. (2002) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263102002024 · Cited by 2,230
Research Genres: Explorations and Applications
Swales, J. M. (2004) · Cited by 1,675
If you look at …: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks
Biber, D. (2004) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/25.3.371 · Cited by 1,539 · cited 5×
“13), which compared the most common recurrent sequences in conversation and academic prose.1 This framework has been applied in several subsequent studies, including Biber and Conrad (1999), Biber, Conrad, and Cortes (2003, 2004), Cortes (2002, 2004), and Partington and Morley (2004).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationLexical Phrases and Language Teaching
Anderson, N. J., Nattinger, J. R., & Decarrico, J. S. (1994) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329018 · Cited by 1,042
The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model
Wray, A., & Perkins, M. R. (2000) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/s0271-5309(99)00015-4 · Cited by 866
Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology
Cortes, V. (2004) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001 · Cited by 839
Sequencing in SLA: Phonological Memory, Chunking, and Points of Order
Ellis, N. C. (1996) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100014698 · Cited by 837
Introduction: Investigating Form‐Focused Instruction
Ellis, R. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00013.x · Cited by 826
Cited by
The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.001.0001 · Cited by 639
The Cartography of Syntactic Structures
Cinque, G., & Rizzi, L. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0003 · Cited by 639
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108686136 · Cited by 623
Self-citationA Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis
Fillmore, C. J., & Baker, C. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0013 · Cited by 252
Mixed methods research: toward new research designs in applied linguistics
Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Biber, D., & Barbieri, F.
- Venue
- English for Specific Purposes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-286
- ISSN
- 0889-4906 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071343301
- Cited by
- 719
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 285.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
- The paper
- Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
