Cited by 10Digital Transformation in IndustryMulti-Criteria Decision MakingImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

Evaluating challenges of implementing Industry 5.0 in the renewable energy supply chain toward sustainability: A comparative analysis using decision-making approaches

Open access
Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin, Amiri, Maghsoud·2025·Energy Strategy Reviews

Abstract

The Renewable Energy (RE) supply chain faces challenges such as infrastructure constraints, and dependence on weather conditions, which affect production stability. Also, high initial costs and unstable support policies create significant financial barriers in RE. Using the capabilities of new technologies can help improve productivity in this field. Industry 5.0 (I5.0) uses developed technology to optimize processes, increase stability, reduce costs, and increase productivity in RE. Therefore, a decision-making framework is presented to assess the challenges of I5.0 in the RE supply chain. It proposes an integrated decision framework including the Fuzzy Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (F-SWARA), and Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution (F-CoCoSo) methods. The sensitivity of the findings and validation are checked with different decision-making approaches. Appropriate investment amount, attention to technical infrastructure, and the availability of financial resources are the most important factors with values of 0.236, 0.172, and 0.129 respectively. The main challenges are insufficient investment and attention to information security for implementing I5.0 in the RE supply chain. Measures and financial incentives for the development of internal and external cooperation and data security measures, advanced encryption protocols, and basic security and cyber actions are necessary to attract investment and create a safe environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.esr.2025.101761

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hosseini Dehshiri, S. J., & Amiri, M.
Affiliations
Allameh Tabataba'i University (IR)
Venue
Energy Strategy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
59
Pages
101761
ISSN
2211-467X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410563841
Cited by
10
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Strategy Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Keywords
Industry 5.0, renewable energy supply chain, supply chain sustainability, implementation barriers, fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, renewable energy investment, information security, cybersecurity, financial barriers, weather dependence, production stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review