Cited by 92Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvancements in Battery MaterialsElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

A machine learning-based battery management system for state-of-charge prediction and state-of-health estimation for unmanned aerial vehicles

Open access
Shibl, Mostafa M., Ismail, Loay S., Massoud, Ahmed M.·2023·Journal of Energy Storage

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.est.2023.107380

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A machine learning framework guided by domain expertise produces SOH estimates that are more precise and computationally effective by using physical knowledge of battery degradation processes.

    “By using physical knowledge of battery degradation processes to guide the ML model, this technique produces SOH estimates that are more precise and computationally efective.”

    From Artificial Intelligence Approaches for SOH Estimation in Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Comprehensive Review of Progress, Critical Evaluations, Challenges, and Toward Future Outlooks (2025) · cites this paper as [182]

    The Mathematical model section (p. unavailable) defines SOH using charge-capacity thresholds and says classification reduces computational demand; Results & Discussion (p. unavailable) reports approximately 0.92 accuracy for the SOH classifier. The paper does not say that physical knowledge of battery degradation processes guides the ML model or causes the reported accuracy and efficiency. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The domain-expertise-guided ML framework facilitates accurate capacity prediction without requiring substantial processing resources.

    “Trough the integration of domain-specifc energy and power fade indicators, the framework facilitates accurate capacity prediction without requiring substantial processing resources.”

    From Artificial Intelligence Approaches for SOH Estimation in Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Comprehensive Review of Progress, Critical Evaluations, Challenges, and Toward Future Outlooks (2025) · cites this paper as [182]

    The Related work section says the proposed approach accurately predicts state of charge and uses classification for state-of-health estimation, substantially reducing computational power. The Results & Discussion section describes voltage, current, and temperature inputs, not domain-specific energy and power fade indicators. The paper does not establish accurate capacity prediction by the framework, so those parts of the claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]25. California], O'Reilly Media, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shibl, M. M., Ismail, L. S., & Massoud, A. M.
Affiliations
Qatar University (QA)
Corresponding author
Shibl, Mostafa M.
Venue
Journal of Energy Storage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
66
Pages
107380
ISSN
2352-152X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4367186878
Cited by
92
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 9
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Energy Storage (publishedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Qatar Foundation
  • Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
  • Qatar National Research Fund (10-0130-170286)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Keywords
battery management systems, unmanned aerial vehicles, state of charge estimation, state of health estimation, lithium-ion batteries, deep neural network, long short-term memory, random forest, battery voltage and current, ambient temperature, ESP32 microcontroller, Raspberry Pi, cloud-based monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review