Cited by 792Neural Networks and ApplicationsData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsStatistical Methods and Applications

Neural networks and statistical techniques: A review of applications

Paliwal, Mukta, Kumar, Usha A.·2009·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.005

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paliwal, M., & Kumar, U. A.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Usha A.
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
2-17
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036599383
Cited by
792
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 57
FWCI
18.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (IIT Bombay) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
artificial neural networks, feedforward neural networks, statistical analysis, prediction, classification, model comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review