Cited by 677Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareNeural Networks and ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine

Open access
Baxt, W.G·1995·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91804-3

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baxt, W. G.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Baxt, W.G
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-10
Volume
346
Issue
8983
Pages
1135-1138
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2123715374
Cited by
677
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 17
FWCI
74.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial neural networks, clinical medicine
MeSH terms
Bone Diseases, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electrocardiography, Electroencephalography, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Radiography, Sensitivity and Specificity, Clinical Medicine, Neural Networks, Computer, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review