The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,960
Fuzzy Sets and Systems - Theory and Applications
Didier Dubois, A., & Prade, H. M. (1980) · Mathematics in Science and Engineering/Mathematics in science and engineering · doi:10.1016/s0076-5392(09)x6008-x · Cited by 6,418
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA From Theory to Execution
Schneider, H., & Stamatis, D. H. (1996) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1996.10484424 · Cited by 1,497
A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval
Yager, R. R. (1981) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/0020-0255(81)90017-7 · Cited by 1,447
Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis
Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, C. E. (1995) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/0951-8320(95)00068-d · Cited by 687
Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning
Pillay, A., & Wang, J. (2003) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(02)00179-5 · Cited by 581
Fuzzy weighted averages and implementation of the extension principle
Dong, W., & Wong, F. S. (1987) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/0165-0114(87)90163-1 · Cited by 554
Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): a possibility approach
Lertworasirikul, S., Fang, S., Joines, J. A., & Nuttle, H. L. W. (2003) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(02)00484-0 · Cited by 411
Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems
Xu, K., Tang, L. C., Xie, M., Ho, S. L., & Zhu, M. L. (2002) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(01)00101-6 · Cited by 380
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–627 of 627
Amrillah, M. S., Rizqi, A. W., & Jufriyanto, M. (2024) · MOTIVECTION Journal of Mechanical Electrical and Industrial Engineering · doi:10.46574/motivection.v6i2.324
Improved Industrial Risk Analysis via a Human Factor-Driven Bayesian Network Approach
Carpitella, S., Izquierdo, J., Plajner, M., & Vomlel, J. (2025) · Springer series in reliability engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72636-1_2
Sisodia, V., Ganesan, D., Salunkhe, S. S., Čep, R., & Nasr, E. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09518-6
Risk Score for Contract Prioritization in Auditing: A Multicriteria Approach with AHP
Nurse, J., Monteiro, S. B. S., Grubisic, V. V. F., & de Souza, J. G. M. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01130-5_25
A Comprehensive Two-Staged MCDM Model for Risk Assessment in Vietnam’s Fintech Crowdfunding Sector
Nguyen, P.-H., Duong, H.-T., Nga, C. T. P., Thanh, V. T., Quang, V. V., & Quỳnh, N. T. (2025) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6250-0_29
Su, G., Huang, L., & Fu, X. (2015) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11104-9_46
Development of Two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis Model in Neutrosophic Environment
Ayatollah, A. S., Moinzad, H., Tooranloo, . S., & Keramati, M. A. (2025) · International Journal of Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1007/s40815-025-02108-8
Barabea, Y., Basahel, A., & Hameed, A. Z. (2026) · American Journal of Management Science and Engineering · doi:10.11648/j.ajmse.20261101.11
Evaluating Energy, Environmental, and Socio-Economic Risks of Nuclear Power in BasraPreprint
Gatea, M. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6229132
Hilger, R. P., & Simske, S. J. (2026) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-026-10076-z
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Using Large-Scale Group Decision Making and Normal Cloud Model
Wu, L., Liu, C., & Song, H. (2026) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e28030360
Duran, Z. (2026) · Business And Management Studies An International Journal · doi:10.15295/bmij.v14i1.2705
A dynamic approach to FMEA–RPN risk classification: comparing with the classical FMEA method
Narlı, M. (2026) · Medycyna Pracy · doi:10.13075/mp.5893.01678
Fajri, A. I., Nasir, M., Ariyanto, D., Mawaddah, S., & Gusti, A. P. (2026) · BIO Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/bioconf/202623402009
Risk Estimation in Textile Industries using Tri-Risk Matrix
Jamal Mohamed Ibrahim, F. (2025) · International Journal of Business Intelligents · doi:10.20894/ijbi.105.014.001.003
Improving the quality of carton packaging products at Tan Long Paper Packaging Company Limited
Van, T. L., & Bang, T. N. V. (2026) · Journal of Thu Dau Mot University · doi:10.37550/tdmu.ejs/2026.02.746
Jovanović, I. M., & Krstić, L. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6960407
Kim, J.-G., & Bai, B. C. (2026) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma19122673
Improving contract performance in the defense procurement system based on a risk-oriented approach
Marchuk, V., Zelinska, M., & Rezanko, O. (2026) · Electronic Scientific Journal Intellectualization of Logistics and Supply Chain Management #1 2020 · doi:10.46783/smart-scm/2026-37-2
Akbar, B. R., Muslimin, M., & Anita, A. (2026) · Jurnal Kendali Teknik dan Sains · doi:10.59581/jkts-widyakarya.v4i3.6376
Fuzzy FMEA Application to Improving Failure Analysis Efficiency in a Coal Handling System
Kumar, S., Kushwaha, D. K., & Kane, P. V. (2026) · Lecture notes in mechanical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-6179-7_2
Bipolar Linguistic Z-Number Framework for FMEA Integrating BWM, CRITIC, and MABACPreprint
Şahin, R., Başkan, E., & Köse, A. E. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9792888/v1
Song, B., Yuan, X., Kang, Y., Zhou, Y., & Niu, J. (2026) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2026.123762
Mungade, V. S. (2025) · International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering · doi:10.22399/ijcesen.5509
AKDAMAR, E., & Ceylan, B. O. (2026) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2026.128588
Teng, X., Liu, S., Huang, J., & He, H. (2026) · Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology · doi:10.1108/aeat-07-2026-0268
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y.-M., Chin, K.-S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J.-B.
- Affiliations
- City University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Ying-Ming
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1195-1207
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983686086
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 12.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Fuzzy Systems and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Keywords
- failure mode and effects analysis, fuzzy risk priority number, risk priority number, fuzzy linguistic terms, alpha-cuts, centroid defuzzification, failure mode prioritization, risk factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review