Cited by 54Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFault Detection and Control Systems

Process knowledge based multi-class support vector classification (PK-MSVM) approach for surface defects in hot rolling

Agarwal, Kuldeep, Shivpuri, Rajiv, Zhu, Yijun, Chang, Tzyy-Shuh, Huang, Howard·2011·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.026

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The problem of uneven intensity in rod/bar is reduced to some extent by using more cameras than strictly required.

    “This problem is reduced to some extent by using more number of cameras than strictly required as in [5,44] (five cameras) and [85] (four cameras).”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [85]

  • PK-MSVM was shown to perform better than other multiple SVM algorithms (one against one, one against all and Hastie's algorithm).

    “PK-MSVM was shown to perform better than other multiple SVM algorithms (one against one, one against all and Hastie's algorithm).”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [85]

  • Multiclass problem solution using SVM has been reported in [25,70,81,83-85].

    “Multiclass problem solution using SVM has been reported in [25,70,81,83-85].”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [85]

  • Gaussian radial basis function (RBF) kernel function was found to be routinely used for steel surface defect classification.

    “Gaussian radial basis function (RBF) kernel function was found to be routinely used for steel surface defect classification [2,83,85].”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [85]

  • Hastie's algorithm was found to perform better than one against one or one against all approach.

    “Further, Hastie's algorithm was found to perform better than one against one or one against all approach.”

    From Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems (2014) · cites this paper as [85]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agarwal, K., Shivpuri, R., Zhu, Y., Chang, T.-S., & Huang, H.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • OG Technologies (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Shivpuri, Rajiv
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
7251-7262
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000217132
Cited by
54
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
the National Science Foundation (IIP-0646502)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
surface defect classification, steel rolling, process knowledge, multi-class support vector machine, automated inspection, feature extraction, defect localization, one-against-one, one-against-all

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review