The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., & Zhao, J.-H. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 · Cited by 2,346
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA From Theory to Execution
Schneider, H. (1996) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1996.10484424 · Cited by 1,493
Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis
Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, C. E. (1995) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/0951-8320(95)00068-d · Cited by 687
Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean
Wang, Y.-M., Chin, K.-S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J.-B. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.028 · Cited by 630
Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP
Kutlu, A. C., & Ekmekçioğlu, M. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044 · Cited by 594
Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning
Pillay, A., & Wang, J. (2003) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(02)00179-5 · Cited by 581
Seyed-Hosseini, S. M., Safaei, N., & Asgharpour, M. J. (2006) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.09.005 · Cited by 410
Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): a possibility approach
Lertworasirikul, S., Fang, S.-C., A. Joines, J., & L.W. Nuttle, H. (2003) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(02)00484-0 · Cited by 410
Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., Liu, N., & Mao, L.-X. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.031 · Cited by 388
Self-citationFuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems
Xu, K., Tang, L. C., Xie, M., Ho, S. L., & Zhu, M. L. (2002) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(01)00101-6 · Cited by 380
Cited by
Improving Risk Evaluation in FMEA With Cloud Model and Hierarchical TOPSIS Method
Liu, H.-C., Wang, L.-E., Li, Z., & Hu, Y.-P. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2018.2861719 · Cited by 351
Self-citationHuang, J., Li, Z., & Liu, H.-C. (2017) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.014 · Cited by 250
Self-citationAn integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA
Boral, S., Howard, I., Chaturvedi, S. K., McKee, K., & Naikan, V. N. A. (2020) · Engineering Failure Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104195 · Cited by 215
Fault Tree Analysis Improvements: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review
Yazdi, M., Mohammadpour, J., Li, H., Huang, H., Zarei, E., Pirbalouti, R. G., & Adumene, S. (2023) · Quality and Reliability Engineering International · doi:10.1002/qre.3271 · Cited by 199
Ervural, B., & Ayaz, H. I. (2023) · Engineering Failure Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107525 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., & Liu, N.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 828-838
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979872891
- Cited by
- 965
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 32.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010
- The paper
- Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013). Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
